Debunking the Holocaust II

PROPAGANDA AND DECEPTION

Example of atrocity propaganda: the case of North Korean defector “Shin Dong Hyeok”

Shin Dong Hyeok’s [Hyuk’s] “testimony” about witnessing human experiments on political prisoners carried much weight in getting the UN to condemn North Korea and punish them with sanctions passed in 2004. He is treated like a celebrity and a hero in the west when the truth is he is a rapist. Shin Dong Hyeok/Hyuk [pronounced Hyok] is not even his real name. It is Shin In Geon/Gun [pronounced “Gone”]. 

Escape from Camp 14? – The Truth about DPRK Defector Shin Dong Hyuk (Part 1 & 2)

VIDEO: Youtube | Bitchute

Shin Dong Hyuk raped a girl in North Korea

The woman in the video says Shin raped her daughter when she was 13, while she was walking home from after-school classes. Her mother says in the interview that she would beat him up if she could get her hands on him. It is likely that Shin’s motive for running away to the west was to escape punishment for his crime.

Mother says Shin raped her daughter when she was 13.

“My daughter was 13 years old when she was raped by Shin In Gun in June 2001. He ruined her life. Because of that she couldn’t get married until today.”

Shin Dong Hyuk lied about growing up in a political prison

Shin Dong Hyuk [pronounced “Shin Dong Hyok”] claimed among other things that he was born in a political prison camp. He said that both his parents had been political prisoners, and that while in the prison camp, he and his family had been tortured. He also claimed both his parents were dead. These claims were exposed as lies when his father appeared on North Korean TV to tell the truth about Shin’s upbringing and background.

In this photo, Shin Dong Hyuk is 6, and he is with a neighbor. His father showed this picture on North Korean television to prove that Shin did not grow up in a political prison camp.

Shin’s mother and brother were convicted murderers

Shin’s father and stepmother expose his real background. Shin’s real name is Shin In Geon [pronounced as “Gone”]. 

This account was corroborated by neighbors, workmates, and acquaintances (see the video below). His mother and older brother were convicted when he was a child of murdering a neighbor who was a hairdresser to steal her money. They were tried and executed. His father later re-married. His stepmother also appears in the video. 

Shin’s drawings: anti-North Korea propaganda

A picture drawn by North Korean defector Shin Dong Hyuk. The caption says “Pregnancy is prohibited within the camp and if a woman is found pregnant, the wards will cut open the woman, throw the fetus away and execute her.”

One of the drawings by Shin Dong Hyuk shows various tortures which he claimed he witnessed as a child in a political prison. His father, friends and work colleagues deny he spent time in a political prison. 

Escape from Camp 14? – The Truth about DPRK Defector Shin Dong Hyuk (Part 3)

VIDEO: Youtube | Bitchute

Shin Dong Hyuk was a miner; his leg injury was from a work accident

The videos reveal how Shin Dong Hyuk totally fabricated his background in North Korea. The team leader where Shin used to work says Shin was a lazy worker, and that he sustained an injury at work where his finger got amputated.

Shin’s father says he got the scars on his leg from a mining accident. 

 

Shin claimed the injuries to his legs were the result of torture in a political prison camp. His father said he got those injuries in a mining accident.

The west’s “human rights racket”

The narrator in the video states:

The world’s public opinion should no longer be misled by their anti-DPRK “human rights racket”.

Based on Shin’s lies, the US Congress passed legislation condemning North Korea for human rights violations. Also, Shin testified about supposed human rights abuses in the DPRK before the UN, repeating his story about being raised in a political camp. His testimony at the UN contributed to harsh sanctions being placed on North Korea. 

Shin is speaking in front of the Geneva Summit for Human Rights and Democracy.

Shin is “testifying” about supposed human rights abuses in the DPRK. In reality, he is telling lies about his experiences in North Korea, and hiding his criminal past.

Shin Dong Hyuk wrote a book based on his lies

The book became a best-seller and has been used to sell an image of DPRK as a human rights violator. Even though Shin retracted large parts of his story later, which happened after his father appeared on North Korean TV, already a lot of damage had been done. 

“Escape from Camp 14” came out before Shin admitted his lies. 

Shin collaborated with Blaine Harden in the writing of this book. Harden has written several books about North Korea.

Even South Korean news agency and South Korea’s intelligence agency deny Shin’s story

Even South Korean news agency Yonhap, normally a vocally anti-DPRK organization, has refuted his claim that he had access to information about political camps, and would not know about “human experiments” he said he witnessed being carried out in political prisons.

A former member of South Korea’s National Intelligence Service said Shin had never lived in a “prison camp”.

Chang In-suk, a defector and head of the North Korean Defectors’ Association in Seoul, claimed to know first hand that Lee had never been a political prisoner.

The accused rapist enjoys hobnobbing with presidents and others who hold high political office

Shin poses with Republican George W. Bush.   

Shin met with Democrat John Kerry.

Shin attended “human rights” rallies where speakers and protesters condemned North Korea.

Shin spoke at the rally above.

Before he made his confession, Shin quoted a tweet from Trump. Trump and the Republican administration pushed legislation against North Korea based on Shin’s lies that the DPRK were doing poisoning “experiments” on political prisoners.

Shin finally admitted he lied

After his father appeared on North Korean television and exposed Shin’s many falsehoods, Shin changed many parts of his story, practically admitting he had lied in interviews, speeches, testimonies and the book he co-authored. However, he had already done a lot of damage by that point to North Korea’s reputation, and sanctions and legislation had already been passed. He also had made a lot of money, profiting from telling falsehoods about the DPRK and his life there.

Litany of Shin Dong Hyuk’s lies and inconsistencies – Shin Dong Hyuk (pronounced “Hyok”) is not his real name; real name is Shin In Gun (pronounced “Geon”). – Says his birthdate is 1982; it is 1980. – Says he was born in a political prison camp; his father says his son has never been in a political prison camp. – Says both his parents are dead; his father is alive and appeared on North Korean TV to give a message to his son. – Says that the injuries on his leg are due to torture; his father says he got them in a mining accident. Shin worked as a miner after he left school. – Says he witnessed human experimentation done on political prisoners in the political prison camp he claimed he was in; his father, other defectors, Yonhap News, Korean NIS say he was never in a political prison. – Says his mother is dead, and that she was executed for escape attempts; not true, his father says his mother and brother were executed in 1996 for murdering a local hairdresser for her money. – Says he left North Korea to escape the repressive regime; it seems he left to escape punishment for raping a child, a 13 year old, who was grabbed by him on the way home from late night class. Her mother gave an interview to North Korean television where she told the truth about his past.

More about Shin Dong Hyuk at Juche Ireland:

As it was already mentioned in the report of the DPRK Association for Human Rights Studies that was released on September the 13th 2014, the main source of manipulations and falsifications with regards to the issue of human rights in the DPRK are the so-called “testimonies” of the so-called “defectors” who in reality are the most vicious enemies of the DPRK. Among these so-called “defectors” is some guy called Shin Dong-hyuk, who is the most active participant in the “human rights” conspiracy campaign of the enemy forces against the DPRK. Continue reading

______________________________________

Lying by refugees and defectors is common

Atrocity propaganda is a lucrative business

In Western nations, refugees get special treatment that ordinary people do not receive. There could be a political motive for governments to play up the “human rights abuses” of governments of countries they are hostile to and would like to attack militarily. This sort of propaganda is called “atrocity propaganda”.

However, with the rise of alternative media, the lies of refugees and defectors are being exposed. Often the person is caught out because they change their story many times.

Some defect to escape punishment for crime

Some defectors and asylum seekers are fleeing prosecution for crimes. They hide the fact that they committed a crime in North Korea. It would be in their interest to speak about North Korea negatively, so as to garner sympathy.

Highlights From “Why Do North Korean Defector Testimonies So Often Fall Apart?”

VIDEO: Youtube | Bitchute

Yeonmi Park: defectors receive as much as $500 per hour 

Yeonmi Park is a famous North Korean defector who has been found to change her story constantly. She has done the circuit of telling her story in front of an audience and getting a fee for it. She is another unreliable North Korean defector.

Many lies and inconsistencies in Park’s story:

1. On South Korean television she presents a different self to the one she presents to westerners. She and her mother say that they were like the “Paris Hilton” of North Korea. She comes from a wealthy family.

2. She says that she escaped the border into China with both her father and mother. She then later makes a speech and tells a different story. This time she says it was only her mother who crossed the border with her.

3. She makes the claim that she watched a person executed in public for watching a foreign film. Sometimes she says it is a James Bond film; other times a South Korean film. Other North Korean defectors have also said that public executions were stopped several years prior to that date.

A 59-year-old woman from Hyesan who escaped in 2009 laughed when asked was anyone ever executed for watching an American movie. “How can you be executed for watching an American film? It sounds ridiculous even saying it. That has never happened before. I go to church with around 350 defectors and you ask any one of them and they will say exactly the same thing,” she told us over the phone from South Korea. Other defectors have confirmed this.

4. She says that she and her mother buried her father after he died of cancer. In the book she wrote, she says that her father was cremated.

5. She says she was starving and had to eat grass to survive, but her mother says the family never starved.

6. At times she says that she lived with her aunt after her parents were arrested for illegal trading. Other times she states that she and her sister survived on their own.

Why do North Korean defectors keep changing their stories?

VIDEO: Youtube | Bitchute

Quote from the video:

“[Media companies] are willing to pay a lot of cash for “eyewitness accounts”. These days, it can be well over $500 an hour.”

Yeonmi Park, DPRK defector and celebrity

VIDEO: Youtube | Bitchute

The Strange Tale of Yeonmi Park A high-profile North Korean defector has harrowing stories to tell. But are they true? By By Mary Ann Jolley December 10, 2014 When 21-year-old North Korean defector, Yeonmi Park, made her debut on the world stage in October this year with harrowing tales of life under the repressive North Korean regime and her perilous escape to freedom, she left audiences, human rights heavyweights, and journalists in tears – some literally sobbing. Wearing a pink, traditional Korean dress with its high waist and voluminous skirt, Park stood before the lectern at the One Young World Summit in Dublin … Continue reading at The Diplomat

_____________________________________

Atrocity Propaganda

The stories told by refugees and other asylum seekers can be used by governments as a form of propaganda. The propagation of false stories of abuse and maltreatment is also linked to the phenomenon of weaponization of human rights. These stories of refugees and defectors can be used to demonize, dehumanize and vilify the governments and sometimes the people of target countries, in order to create a pretext  for attacking these countries, and in other ways, bringing about a change in government or “regime change”.

Shin Dong Hyuk (not his real name), a defector from North Korea, has spoken a lot about alleged human rights abuses in North Korea. However, his account of his life in North Korea has been exposed as mostly lies by his own father. 

Atrocity Propaganda

Atrocity propaganda is a term referring to the spreading of deliberate fabrications or exaggerations about the crimes committed by an enemy, constituting a form of psychological warfare. 

Atrocity propaganda can lead to real atrocities

Shin Dong Hyuk (not his real name), a defector from North Korea, with Samantha Power, USA’s ambassador to the UN under Obama. 

According to Paul Linebarger, atrocity propaganda leads to real atrocities, as it incites the enemy into committing more atrocities, and, by heating up passions, it increases the chances of one’s own side committing atrocities, in revenge for the ones reported in propaganda.[4] Atrocity propaganda might also lead the public to mistrust reports of actual atrocities.

Read more: Atrocity Propaganda

(Part III of “Debunking the Holocaust” is here.)

________________________________________

Weaponization of Human Rights

Atrocity propaganda is one component in the “weaponization of human rights”. Increasingly, human rights is an issue that is becoming highly politicized. For example, the mainstream media can completely ignore the human rights abuses of Israel and Saudi Arabia, but run daily stories of supposed human rights abuses in North Korea.

Shin Dong Hyuk, a North Korean defector, has been exposed as a fabricator by his father

Atrocity propaganda is war propaganda

The inherently violent nature of war means that exaggeration and invention of atrocities often becomes the main staple of propaganda. Patriotism is often not enough to make people hate, and propaganda is also necessary. “So great are the psychological resistances to war in modern nations”, wrote Harold Lasswell, “that every war must appear to be a war of defense against a menacing, murderous aggressor. There must be no ambiguity about who the public is to hate.”

Read more: Atrocity Propaganda

The role of NGOs in weaponization of human rights

Shin Dong Hyuk, North Korean defector, here with Roberta Cohen, a fellow at the Brookings Institution.

Since the issue of toppling of governments or “regime change” revolves around justifications, the topic of human rights gains central importance. NGOs have been playing a bigger role in the weaponization of human rights.

Modern Warfare Korea: the Weaponization of Human Rights

by Michael Bassett, September 11, 2015

[…] Searching ‘North Korea’ on the Internet reveals millions of hits echoing a consensus that North Korea is an ongoing “meth-addicted,” “nuclear threat to humanity,” “a holocaust,” a “hell-on-earth,” and a place where “unimaginable cruelties” such as “castrating the disabled,” and “mass murder by machine-gun fire” regularly occur. Even if true, in-depth inquiry reveals little actual proof of these claims. Regardless, most surmise that (for the good of its people) the country should be overthrown and “liberated” as quickly as possible.

Read more at Modern Warfare Korea: Weaponization of Human Rights

______________________________________

Secondary gain

The issue of secondary gain is a concept used in psychiatry to describe malingerers, who have something to gain by pretending to be ill. It can also be applied to those who actually suffer a real illness but who exaggerate the severity of their symptoms.

Secondary gain is defined as the advantage that occurs secondary to stated or real illness. Transition into the sick role may have some incidental secondary gains for patients. Types of secondary gain include using illness for personal advantage, exaggerating symptoms, consciously using symptoms for gain, and unconsciously presenting symptoms with no physiological basis.  

NCBI

The issue of secondary gain is applicable to the cases of people who tell fake accounts of the internment of prisoners in German camps during WW2. They will exaggerate the pain and suffering of camp inmates or themselves or fabricate incidents of atrocity in order to gain sympathy or other advantages, including monetary compensation.

They will also downplay the atrocities their own ethnic group performed on others.

Types of secondary gain

• inducing a feeling of guilt in others
• avoidance of facing responsibility
• financial gain
• distraction from their own crimes or misdeeds
• censoring others’ speech
• shutting down discussion or examination of a subject
• gaining a position of moral superiority
• demonizing an enemy
• hiding their own atrocities, including war crimes, done on other people
• creating justification for attacking an enemy: it is a “punishment”
• justifying the making of laws that benefit one, using the excuse that such an atrocity must be prevented from happening again
• gaining the status of a martyred “saint”
• having a weapon one can use politically
• manipulating the discourse using “political correctness”
• use in war propaganda
• use in political propaganda
• encouraging groupthink
• manipulating others to feel they need security and a guarantee of protection
• justifying aggression

Malingering 

The DSM-5 describes malingering as the intentional production of false or grossly exaggerated physical or psychological problems. Motivation for malingering is usually external (e.g., avoiding military duty or work, obtaining financial compensation, evading criminal prosecution, or obtaining drugs).

American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Psychiatric Disorders, 2013

The “DSM-5” refers to the fifth edition (2013 edition) of the American Psychiatric Association publication, “Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Psychiatric Disorders”.

Munchausen Syndrome

An illustration from a book about Muchausen’s tales.

A drawing of Baron Munchausen rendered by an artist.

Munchausen’s syndrome was named after Karl Frederick Hieronymus, Frieherr Von Munchausen, a German Cavalry officer who was well known for exaggerating his adventures. Over time, his stories became more and more expansive and outlandish. Munchausen became somewhat famous after a collection of his tales was published.

Munchausen’s syndrome entered the DSM classification for the first time in 1980. Therefore, it is likely that this condition is underdiagnosed. It is thought that people with FD feign illness or injury not to achieve a clear benefit, such as financial gain, but rather to gain the sympathy and special attention often given to people who are truly ill.

ncbi

“DSM” refers to American Psychiatric Association’s publication called the “Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Psychiatric Disorders”.

Munchausen’s Syndrome by proxy

This refers to a syndrome in which the adult subject deliberately causes an injury to or induces illness in their child in order to gain sympathy for themselves.

Munchausen syndrome is related to Munchausen syndrome by proxy (MSbP/MSP), which refers to the abuse of another person, typically a child, in order to seek attention or sympathy for the abuser. This drive to create symptoms for the victim can result in unnecessary and costly diagnostic or corrective procedures.

Huffman, J.C., Stern, T.A. (2003) The diagnosis and treatment of Munchausen’s syndrome. General Hospital Psychiatry: 25:5, p. 358-363.

#shindonghyuk #koreandefector #defector

___________________________

Monetary motive: Defectors from North Korea can earn up to $860,000 

The financial motive to fabricate abuse and make up stories about labor camps in North Korea can be very great.

South Korea will award up to one billion won (USD 860,000) to defectors from the North with classified information about the reclusive state, reports said Sunday. The government currently offers up to USD 217,000 to defectors from the North with sensitive information but this would be the first increase in reward money in two decades. Indian Express

______________________________

Atrocity propaganda: the real victims may be portrayed as the aggressors 

Lurid over-the-top sensational reports of North Korean prison life The video below is typical of the propaganda that turns up on mainstream media like Google’s Youtube if you search for information about North Korea. These videos are made with no to little evidence, unless you consider the accounts by defectors to be reliable and ignore the fact that these defectors have a great motive, including a monetary motive, to lie, embellish, distort and exaggerate. A picture of a purple cabbage is supposedly enough to make one think there were actual poisoned cabbage experiments conducted. No other actual “proof” is provided. Example of atrocity propaganda: “5 Horrible Human Experiments in North Korea” VIDEO: Youtube The video shows some images that come from the internet. In some cases, the images are not even conclusively of North Korean people; they are images of anonymous people that can be downloaded from the internet by anyone. Pictures of victims from the Ryongchon disaster in North Korea are used in atrocity propaganda against the North Korean government The video even uses photos from the Ryongheon disaster in North Korea, which is suspected by this author to be a mini-nuclear bombing using a tactical nuclear weapon. Ryongcheon is a North Korean town that is situated close to the border with China. There is evidence that Mossad are behind the suspected bombing. More about the 2004 Ryongchon disaster: Did Mossad Bomb North Korea? A still in the video is taken from the Ryongcheon disaster. These are elementary school children with injuries from flying debris. Ryongcheon Elementary School was quite close to the supposed Ground Zero. The elementary school in Ryongcheon that was destroyed in the explosion. A still from the video is taken from the Ryongcheon disaster and shows people cleaning up the debris. People inspecting the trains. The official story is that the trains carried ammonia fertilizer which caught fire from an electric cable that it came into contact with and blew up. More: Did Mossad bomb North Korea?  Unit 731: North Koreans were victims of Japanese experiments on live humans Unit 731 personnel conduct a bacteriological trial upon a test subject in Nongan County of northeast China’s Jilin Province. November 1940. Link The video uses imagery to imply the North Koreans do live human experiments on their own people. However, the truth is that Korean people, including many in the resistance groups that were captured by the Japanese, were used in Japanese experiments on live people. Lee Gi-su, victim of Unit 731 experiments — photo courtesy Jin Chengmin, via Chosun Ilbo During the Japanese occupation of Korea and Manchuria, the Japanese performed vivisection on North Koreans and Chinese. These victims were often rebels who had been captured by the Japanese. The organization that did these experiments on live humans was called Unit 731. The Japanese government tested chemical weapons on humans as well as performed surgical experiments on their captive victims. After the Japanese were defeated in 1945, the Americans seized the files on the experiments. Using the information contained in the files, the US government designed bioweapons which some researchers claim were used on North Koreans and Chinese during the Korean War. Korean War: Americans used biowarfare on Koreans and Chinese Jeffrey Kaye, who investigated Unit 731, was able to find incriminating evidence when two dozen documents were released by the CIA as part of the celebration of the sixtieth anniversary of the Korean War. Kaye writes: “The handprint of Unit 731, which the United States and Japan both covered up, were all over this, […] the same people (in the U.S. Chemical Warfare Service) who had advocated and lobbied for the amnesty and the collaboration with (Head of Unit 731) Shiro Ishii and his cohorts, ended up later advocating biological warfare and were put in positions of responsibility in 1950-1951.” References: Interview: CIA confidential files expose use of Unit 731-inspired U.S. bioweapons in Korean War — U.S. author Adam Cathcart: Unit 731: Korean Victims and World Heritage Censored: North Korea Accused U.S. of Working with Unit 731 War Criminals on BW Attacks United States Biological Warfare during the Korean War: rhetoric and reality Images involving the Korean War are bizarrely used in the video that accuses North Koreans of live human experimentation This picture was taken from the video and shows people mourning family members killed in the Korean War. The North Koreans suffered a disproportionately high number of losses. Some people claim that a quarter of North Korea’s population, some 3-4 million people, were wiped out during the war. US bombers would often target civilians. This is a painting made by North Koreans showing the ill-treatment of a North Korean captive at the hands of Americans during the Korean War. Absurdedly it is used in a video that accuses North Koreans of committing atrocities such as live human experiments on their own people. Read more about the Korean War at Internet Archive: Bruce Cumings: North Korea Images in the anti-North Korea video are not even of North Koreans This picture shows a European torture victim of the Bolsheviks, whose atrocities are well-documented by photo, and yet it is used in a video to portray a “victim” of the North Korean government. More pictures of European victims whose faces are disfigured by torture can be found in the chapter about Bolshevik atrocities in this blog (Part IV). Ironically, the United States supported the Bolsheviks during WWII against the nationalists who were trying to take back their nations from Bolshevik communist control. The writing in the picture is not Korean but Chinese. The creator of the video does not even appear to know the difference between Korean and Chinese writing. The Chinese use ideographs whereas Koreans use a phonetic alphabet. This is a random picture of disabled children. They do not even appear to be Korean children. However, these pictures influence people to think the atrocities are proven. Such sloppy kind of “reporting” can harm a nation’s image and cause the masses to demonize such a nation if enough people get taken in by it, which can happen if these sorts of fake reports flood the internet. One person who was influenced by this kind of “reporting” was moved to investigate the truth of these stories himself. His story is below. __________________________ Matthew Miller’s imprisonment – expecting torture, he was instead “killed by kindness” Matthew Miller is an American who went to North Korea to try and get imprisoned so he could check out for himself first hand if the North Korean prisons were as really terrible as the western media portrayed them to be. When he arrived in North Korea, his main concern was that he would not be arrested. As preparation for his mission, he tore up his visa while he was on the plane from China to North Korea.  On the first day, the North Korean authorities told the young man to go home when they found out what he had done. But Miller insisted and ended up claiming political asylum in order to stay in North Korea. So 15 days later, after much persuasion by Miller, he was detained by the authorities, had a trial and was sentenced to prison. His prison experience was ordinary, consisting of a routine of working, eating, some leisure time and sleeping. Miller was assigned a bilingual interpreter who liaised with him frequently and with whom Miller became quite friendly. Expecting to be tortured, Miller reports he was “killed with kindness”. Finally, having grown bored with prison life and having successfully completed his mission to find out what North Korean prison life was like, he lobbied the US government to help release him, and he was freed two years into his six-year sentence. Read more: The Guardian ONLY ON AP American Matthew Miller, serving six years of hard labour, describes prison life VIDEO: Youtube

______________________________

Death by gassing, death by electric floors, and death by semen-milking machines

Lies about mass murder by quicklime / vacuum chambers / steam chambers / a “building where the floor was electrified in a special way” / pedal-operated brain-bashing machines / masturbation machines / atomic devices for vaporizing 20,000 Jews / Jew-eating bear and Jew-pecking eagle / being made to climb trees that would be chopped down / being pushed off cliffs, etc. were common after the liberation of the inmates from the concentration camps.

No story about the supposed Holocaust from so-called Holocaust survivors is too outlandish to be denied say some laws in 16 countries. These stories include death by semen-milking machines. Denying these accounts from “survivors” is a crime according to these laws.

In “Stolen Soul” (2004), a book written by an “Auschwitz survivor”, Bernard Holstein talks about how Nazi doctors attempted to prove Aryan superiority by collecting Jewish semen with masturbating machines that often killed their subjects.

Quote (page 117):

But we never gave in, not really; there was that one time just before liberation but other than that we were strong. We would see the boys they put on those masturbating machines just drop, just die, right there in front of us. The absolute cruelty was beyond our belief.

That they could do these things to us, that human beings were doing it to other human beings… and we would hobble back to camp with painfully swollen scrotums whimpering: “Don’t bump me! Please, just don’t touch me!”

However, none of these stories took off. The one that did, death by gassing in shower rooms, came to be widely circulated and propagated in the mainstream press, and has evolved into the current Holocaust story we know today: the “Six million Jews were killed by gassing in concentration camps run by Germans” myth.

(Part III of “Debunking the Holocaust” is here.)

#rudolfhoss #torture #confession

______________________________

“Six million” was a common theme of Jewish atrocity propaganda long before Hitler came to power

There were numerous campaigns in the US to raise money for Jews in Europe and elsewhere around the world. Some dates are 1919, 1923, 1924, 1926, 1930 and 1940. All of the campaigns wanted to raise $6,000,000.

This rabbi said, “There are 6,000,000 living, bleeding, suffering arguments in favor of Zionism”

As early as 1905, the date of The New York Times article, Jews were claiming that 6,000,000 of their co-religionists were in danger of dying in massacres in Russia. At a meeting of a Jewish relief league, Dr. Paul Nathan also said that the Russian Government had a “studied policy for the ‘solution’ of the Jewish question, which involved “systematic and murderous extermination”.

These Old Newspapers Read Six Million Jews Died From 1915 – 1938 Before Hitler Was In Power!

VIDEO: Watch on Bitchute

______________________________

International Red Cross document says 271,301 died in German camps

“The Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross on its activities during the second world war” can be read here.

Shown is the title page of “The International Red Cross report on its activities during the war”. This document destroys the myth of “six million” dead and that the Germans ran “death camps”. The Germans ran the camps humanely.

Red Cross records and reports have been sealed and guarded carefully until opened

Sealed and guarded since the end of WWII at Arolsen, Germany, the Official IRC records reveal the actual Concentration Camp total death toll was 271,301. This report was published in Geneva in 1948. It was named Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War.

Red Cross visited German camps once a month and gave prisoners food parcels

The International Red Cross visited the camps and interviewed the prisoners. On these visits, the International Red Cross delivered food parcels as well as parcels of medicine and clothing which had been donated by people all over the world to the prisoners. The Red Cross were often overwhelmed by the number of parcels they had to deliver to the prisoners.

Prisoners communicated with the outside world through letters

Grateful prisoners from Dachau, Buchenwalk, Sangerhausen, Sachsenhausen, Oranienburg, Flossenburg, Landsberg-am-Lech, Fibha, Ravensbruck, Hamburg-Neuengamme, Mauthausen, Theresienstadt, Auschwitz, Bergen-Belsen and others sent letters of thanks for these donations. The ICR Committee received a voluminous flow of mail from Auschwitz until the camp changed hands from the Germans to the Soviets.

Red Cross work stopped abruptly in Auschwitz after Soviets occupied Poland

After the Soviet occupation began, the organization’s efforts to send relief to the camp were futile.

No mention of gas chambers by the Red Cross

In all of the reports made by the International Red Cross Committee (1,600 pages, three volumes in total), there is no mention of gas chambers. There are also no references to “death camps” or “extermination camps” in the original 1946 report.

Red Cross blamed deaths and starvation of prisoners on chaotic conditions at the end of the war

Says the Report: “in the chaotic condition of Germany after the invasion during the final months of the war, the camps received no food supplies at all and starvation claimed an increasing number of victims.”

The Red Cross called the Allies “barbaric” for bombing food supply lines

The Red Cross were explicit in pinning the blame for lack of food supplies on the Allies, who had been bombing Germany’s transportation system ruthlessly. The Red Cross protested to the Allies in 1944 about the “the barbarous aerial warfare of the Allies” (Inter Armet Caritns, p. 78).

The Allied’s bombing threatened the food situation of ordinary Germans

The International Red Cross Committee warned the German government that starvation of the German people was inevitable pending the collapse of the German transportation system, which was being heavily bombed by the Allies.

Not all Jews in German territory were interned – millions were free civilians

We know there were as many as 150,000 Jews in the Wehrmacht (German Army) and armies of allied nations, but there were also non-military Jews who were allowed to live freely as civilians. This includes Jewish prisoners who had been released from concentration camps through the graduation system of the camps.

Information about the free civilian population of Jews within society is dealt with in Volume III of the “Report of the International Red Cross”.

In Slovakia, for example, a large proportion of the Jewish population had permission to stay in that country as free civilians. Many Polish Jews migrated to German-occupied Slovakia and lived there freely.

Prisoners including Jews were paid for their labor in the camps say Red Cross

In Slovakia, prisoners in camps were paid fair market wages for their labor. In many camps, a coupon system operated, where workers were rewarded with coupons for labor they had performed. With these coupons, the prisoners could buy items from the convenience stores inside the camps. There were also banks operating within the camps where prisoners could keep accounts.

“While it is true that the law of May 15, 1942 had brought about the internment of several thousand Jews, these people were held in camps where the conditions of food and lodging were tolerable, and where the internees were allowed to do paid work on terms almost equal to those of the free labour market” (Vol. I, p. 646)

Red Cross: Only three million Jews in Europe and emigration was allowed by the Germans during the war

Red Cross say Europe had three million Jews at the start of the war, and that large numbers of Jews emigrated from Germany-occupied lands before the war and during the war. Many Jews migrated to Hungary, Romania and Turkey throughout the war. Many Jews, especially Polish Jews, went to France before its occupation by the Germans, and obtained permits to migrate to the United States.

From Hungary, Jews were permitted to go to Palestine, unhindered by the German government.

______________________________

#nuremberg

Nuremberg Trials: Torture was used to extract manufactured testimonies

The torture of Rudolf Höss

Rudolf Höss at his trial in Nuremberg

Extracts are taken from “How the British Obtained The Confessions Of Rudolf Höss” by Robert Faurisson

Auschwitz Commandant Rudolf Höss was tortured by British interrogators to manufacture evidence for the claim that German camps were extermination camps and Jews were gassed to death there.

Many Holocaust revisionists had suspected that Höss had been tortured to extract false testimony from him (because of the improbable and even impossible nature of the events described in his “confessions”). The use of torture was confirmed four decades after the Nuremberg Trials, when a book about the Nuremberg Trials (written by an anti-national socialist) was published. The author is Rupert Butler and the book is “Legions of Death”, published in 1983.

Butler interviewed Sergeant-interpreter Bernard Clarke for his book. Clarke is supposed to be the man who captured Rudolf Höss. Clarke is Jewish, as were many of the interrogators and prosecutors in the Nuremberg Trials. Clarke’s statements are included in the book.

The book gives a thorough and detailed account of the torture of Rudolf Höss, as related by his torturers.

In the book, Clarke writes that Höss was captured on a farm where he was working, under an assumed identity, in March 1946.

It took three days of torture to obtain a “coherent statement”, says Clarke.

This “coherent statement” was the confession that Höss ran a death camp at Auschwitz and had murdered 2 million Jews in gas chambers. This “confession” sealed the myth of the Holocaust. Before that, no document existed that proved the German National Socialists had a plan to exterminate Jews. So, by the use of torture to extract a confession from the Auschwitz camp commandant Rudolf Höss, such a document was created.

The admittance of using torture to extract testimony from Höss is corroborated by Ken Jones, a private in the British army, in an interview he gave to a newspaper (Wrexham Leader, October 17, 1986).

“They brought him to us when he refused to cooperate over questioning about his activities during the war. He came in the winter of 1945/6 and was put in a small jail cell in the barracks,” recalls Mr. Jones. Two other soldiers were detailed with Mr. Jones to join Höss in his cell to help break him down for interrogation. “We sat in the cell with him, night and day, armed with axe handles. Our job was to prod him every time he fell asleep to help break down his resistance,” said Mr. Jones. When Höss was taken out for exercise he was made to wear only jeans and a thin cotton shirt in the bitter cold. After three days and nights without sleep, Höss finally broke down and made a full confession to the authorities. (Wrexham Leader, October 17, 1986)

Other famous cases of torture by the Allies are those of Julius Streicher, Hans Fritzsche, Oswald Pohl, Franz Ziereis, and Josef Kramer.

However, the confession of Höss is the most serious one in its implications in the absence of any written documentary proof of an extermination plan by the Germans. Léon Poliakov admitted this in 1951:

As regards the conception properly called of the plan for a total extermination, the three or four principal actors committed suicide in May of 1945. No document has survived or perhaps has ever existed.

Nevertheless, this has not stopped Poliakov and other historians of his persuasion to repeatedly return to the confessions of Höss, Gerstein and others, as proof of an extermination plan and to perpetuate the myth of the Holocaust.

Ball-crusher, a torture device. “German POWs reported that the torture techniques included deprivation of sleep, starvation, systematic beatings, ripping hair from the scalp, menacing with red-hot pokers, threatened use of electrical devices to deliver shocks, and, finally, the worst torture of all, the slow and systematic mangling of the spermatic cords of the testicles—a procedure that had their victims thrashing about and screaming like wild animals for hours.” Renegade Tribune

“Heretic’s fork” – an instrument of torture used in the 17th century in Europe to torture heretics of Christianity. Some say Holocaust is a religion and Holocaust Denial laws are used to punish heretics of the Holocaust.

“Heretic’s fork” was used to torture heretics of Christianity. Likewise Holocaust revisionists are persecuted in many ways.

There is more evidence that the “confession” that Höss made was forced out of him by torture. A German witness called Moritz von Schirmeister, an attache of Goebbels, was in the same car as Rudolf Höss on his way to Nuremberg prison. In a document that he allegedly left behind, he writes that Höss told him:

“Certainly, I signed a statement that I killed two and a half million Jews. But I could just as well have said that it was five million Jews. There are certain methods by which any confession can be obtained, whether it is true or not.”

Moritz von Schirmeister is precisely that “prisoner of war who had been brought over from London as a witness in Fritzsche’s defense about whom Höss speaks in his “memoirs” (see above, p. 393).

After Rudolf Höss was made to write a statement by torture that he had witnessed bodies being ignited and the fat oozing from them being poured onto other bodies, and that two million had been killed at Auschwitz, with killings reaching a rate of 10,000 victims a day*, he was made to sign another statement.

*Perhaps Rudolf Höss, knowing how his confession was going to be used, made his testimony as exaggerated as possible, so as to give clues to those who examined his statements closely that his account was made up or were scripted.

The British torturers of Rudolf Höss had no reason to exercise any restraint. After making him sign document NO-1210 at 2:30 in the morning of the l4th or l5th of March 1946, they obtained a new signature from him on March 16, this time at the bottom of a text in English, written in an English handwriting style, with a blank in the space where the name of the place ought to have been given. His guards made him sign a simple note written in English:

Statement made voluntarily at ______ Gaol by Rudolf Höss, former Commandant of Auschwitz Concentration Camp on l6th day of March 1946. I personally arranged on orders received from Himmler in May 1941 the gassing of two million persons between June/July 1941 and the end of 1943 during which time I was commandant of Auschwitz. signed. Rudolf Höss, SS-Stubhr. Eh. (?) Kdt. v. Auschwitz-Birkenau (even the word “signed” was written in an English hand). (“The Auschwitz Myth” – Wilhelm Stäglich.

The exclusively Jewish origin of the Auschwitz myth

We have known for some time that the Auschwitz myth is of an exclusively Jewish origin. Arthur R. Butz has related the facts in his book, The Hoax of the Twentieth Century, as has Wilhelm Stäglich in The Auschwitz Myth. The principal authors of the creation and the peddling of the “rumor of Auschwitz” have been, successively, two Slovaks, Alfred Wetzler (or Weczler) and Rudolf Vrba (or Rosenberg or Rosenthal); then a Hungarian, Rabbi Michael Dov Ber Weissmandel (or Weissmandl); then, in Switzerland, representatives of the World Jewish Congress like Gerhard Riegner, who were in touch with London and Washington; and finally Americans like Harry Dexter White, Henry Morgenthau Jr. and Rabbi Stephen Samuel Wise. Thus was born the famous World Refugee Board Report on Auschwitz and Birkenau, published in Washington in November 1944. Copies of this report were included in the files of the judges advocate general in charge of prosecuting the Germans involved in the Auschwitz camp. It constituted the official version of the story of the alleged gassing of the Jews in that camp. Most probably it was used as a reference work by the inquirers-interrogators-torturers of “the Commandant of Auschwitz.” All the names here mentioned are those of Jews.

Torturers of Rudolf Höss included many Jews among their number

Moreover we now see that Bernard Clarke, the first British torturer, was a Jew, The second British torturer, Major Draper (?), may also have been a Jew. The same for the two Americans: psychologist G.M. (Gustave Mahler) Gilbert and Colonel Harlan Amen. Finally, in Poland, Höss was faced with Polish Jews who treated him more or less the same way. When he wrote his “memoirs” it was under the supervision of instructing magistrate Jan Sehn, who was also probably a Jew.

What became of Bernard Clarke, who participated in manufacturing false testimony, and was proud of doing so?

Bernard Clarke is “today a successful businessman working in the south of England” (Legions of Death, 1983, p. 235). One can in fact say that it is his voice that was heard at Nuremberg on 15 April 1946, when Assistant Prosecutor Amen read, piece by piece, to an astonished and overwhelmed audience, the supposed confession of Rudolf Höss. On that day was launched a lie of world-wide dimensions: the lie of Auschwitz. At the origins of that prodigious media event: several Jewish sergeants of British Military Security, including Bernard Clarke, “today a successful businessman working in the south of England.”

The torture revelations show that the entire Auschwitz myth is fabricated

The unintentional revelations of Rupert Butler in 1983 and unexpected revelations of the “Toronto Trial” in 1985 succeeded at last in showing entirely and clearly how the Auschwitz myth was fabricated from 1944 to 1947, to be exact from April 1944, when Rudolf Vrba and Alfred Wetzler are supposed to have escaped from Auschwitz to tell their story to the world up until April 1947, when Rudolf Höss was hanged after having supposedly told the same world his own story about Auschwitz.

It is remarkable that from beginning to end that story comes from essentially or perhaps even exclusively Jewish sources. Two Jewish liars (Vrba and Wetzler) from Slovakia convinced or seemed to have convinced other Jews from Hungary, Switzerland, United States, Great Britain, and Poland. This is not a conspiracy or a plot; it is the story of the birth of a religious belief: the myth of Auschwitz, center of the religion of the Holocaust. Dr Robert Faurisson

How the British Obtained The Confessions Of Rudolf Höss By Dr. Robert Faurisson The Journal for Historical Review Winter 1986 Volume 7 page 389 11-27-5 Rudolf Höss was the first of three successive commandants of the Auschwitz concentration camp. He is often called “the Commandant of Auschwitz,” and the general public knows of him from a book published under the title Commandant in Auschwitz. He appeared before the International Military Tribunal as a witness on 15 April 1946, where his deposition caused a sensation. To the amazement of the defendants and in the presence of journalists from around the world, he confessed to the most frightful crimes that history had ever known. He said that he had personally received an order from Himmler to exterminate the Jews. He estimated that at Auschwitz 3,000,000 people had been exterminated, 2,500,000 of them by means of gas chambers. His confessions were false. They had been extorted from Höss by torture, but it took until 1983 to learn the identity of the torturers and the nature of the tortures they inflicted upon him. The confessions of Rudolf Höss supply the keystone to the theory which maintains that systematic extermination of the Jews, especially by means of homicidal gas chambers, was a historical reality. Read more: The Journal for Historical Review: Winter 1986 Volume 7 page 389 | Rense: “How the British Obtained The Confessions Of Rudolf Höss” by Dr Robert Faurisson

Thousands of Germans were tortured by British Military Intelligence: this occurred during the war and continued after the war

It has since been openly admitted in the memoirs of the top British official, Colonel Alexander Scotland, who ran the interrogation program, that thousands of Germans were tortured by British Military Intelligence, under the direction of the Prisoner of War Interrogation Section (PWIS). This torture of German POWs occurred during the war to obtain military intelligence. After the war was over, it was used again in order to obtain confessions for convictions of “war crimes”. Renegade Tribune

The article below outlines how many Americans were involved in torturing German prisoners. Many of the torturers were Jewish.

Apparently, as many as three out four interrogators at Nuremberg had been Jewish—and these Jewish interrogators, I was to learn to my horror, had been by far the most sanguinary and sadistic. There was almost no level of human depravity to which these monsters were not willing to sink, including forcing their German victims to eat excrement and to have sex with disinterred corpses.

Torture and Testicle Crushing at Nuremberg by Lasha Darkmoon Rudolf Höss and other German defendants in Nuremberg Trials Confessions at Nuremberg were obtained under torture. The grimmest of these tortures, practiced mostly by Jewish operatives on their German prisoners of war, was testicle crushing. “The Holocaust legend is built on ‘confessions’ obtained by the use of torture.” So begins an article that has just been brought to my attention by an unknown emailer. At the same time, by sheer coincidence, another correspondent has just sent me some stomach-churning details about testicle crushing. He ends his letter with these words : “This is what Jewish interrogators did to their German prisoners of war after WWII in order to get them to “sing”—i.e., to confess to crimes they never committed.” I was a bit shocked by these words. To tell the truth, testicle crushing is not something I have thought about a great deal, nor do I wish to dwell too much on this distasteful subject. I am aware of course that a lot of testicle crushing went on at Nuremberg in order to wring confessions out of the prostrate Germans, but I had been unaware that American Jews had been foremost in the ranks of these torturers. Apparently, as many as three out four interrogators at Nuremberg had been Jewish—and these Jewish interrogators, I was to learn to my horror, had been by far the most sanguinary and sadistic. There was almost no level of human depravity to which these monsters were not willing to sink, including forcing their German victims to eat excrement and to have sex with disinterred corpses. (See below) […] More: Renegade Tribune: Torture and Testicle Crushing at Nuremberg

_____________________________

“Judea declares war on Germany”

Did Germany have a choice over interning Jews?

The “Jewish Nation” or “Judea” declared war on Germany on 24 March, 1933. This may have been what prompted the Nazis to put people of Jewish descent into German labor camps. Such a move could be seen as reducing incidences of subversion and sabotage by people within the borders of Germany and German-occupied nations who were of Jewish descent, as it could be surmised there would be many Jews who opposed the Nazi government and were ready to resist it.

This newspaper proves that world Jewry declared war on Germany as long ago as 1933. Germany was boycotted and the power of international Jews and the corporations they were in control of, including banks, were brought down to bear on crushing Germany. This is why Jews are considered to form “a nation within a nation”, and the loyalty of Jews to the country they are born in or reside in is frequently questioned.

On the other hand, some people would argue that the declaration of war by the “Jewish Nation” was a response to the discrimination experienced by Jews that was practised by the Nazi regime. It is hard to say which came first: discrimination against Jews, including their exclusion from certain activities in Germany, and a curtailment of their rights, or the discrimination against Germans by the “Jewish Nation”, including boycotts and the waging of a propaganda and economic war against the Nazi state. Suffice it to say that relations between Gentile Germans and Jews were fraught with hostilities before the outbreak of WW2.

Similarly, Americans, fearing subversion and sabotage, put Americans of Japanese and German descent into concentration camps in America.

Judea declares war on Germany Jews of All The World Unite in Action BOYCOTT OF GERMAN GOODS MASS DEMONSTRATIONS IN MANY DISTRICTS DRAMATIC ACTION “Daily Express” Special Political Correspondent. 24 March, 1933 ALL Israel is uniting in wrath against the Nazi onslaught on the Jews in Germany. Adolf Hitler, swept into power by an appeal to elemental patriotism, is making history of a kind he least expected. Thinking to unite only the German nation to race consciousness he has roused the whole Jewish people to a national renaissance. The appearance of the Swastika symbol of a new Germany has called forth the Lion of Judah, the old battle symbol of Jewish defiance. Fourteen million Jews dispersed throughout the world have banded together as one man to declare war on the German persecutors of their co-religionists […] Read more at Radio Islam

A 1937 rally calling for the boycott of National Socialist Germany

(Part I of “Debunking the Holocaust” is here.)

_______________________________

The truth about the camps

Peacocks, manicured lawns, flower beds, monkeys and a parrot

 

A description of Ravensbruck, which was an exclusively all-female camp

The depiction of Auschwitz below is adapted from Real Auschwitz . Auschwitz was a camp in Poland. The photos are taken from Holocaust museums or from actual camp sites. There was central heating in the barracks, and the prisoners had access to flush toilets. Medical facilities were fully equipped with xray machines and the operating suite was modern and fully fitted out. The dental clinic looked like a normal clinic. There was a maternity ward where prisoners had their babies. Places of worship were also provided. There were swimming pools and soccer fields in many of the camps. Soccer players wore proper uniforms when they played. There was also a theater building and a cinema.

The Real Auschwitz Visits by the Red Cross were routine: Supposedly the most homicidal of the German camps, Auschwitz was repeatedly visited by Red Cross inspection teams, who were allowed to speak to prisoner representatives alone in order to hear first-hand of any mistreatment, chicanery, interruption of mail and parcel delivery, health concerns, food and ration matters etc. No such visits took place at the Soviet gulag camps. Auschwitz, supposedly a “death camp”, had many facilities amongst which were camp dental facilities. These were attended by camp inmate dentists and nurses who dealt with the inmates’ dental problems. Before the war, 43% of Germany’s dentists were Jewish. In the camp were “sick barracks”, attended by camp inmate doctors and nurses, who dealt with the inmates’ health problems. These were much like the now common walk-in clinics in modern U.S. communities. There was a camp hospital to which expert surgeons from the famous Berlin “Charité” Surgical Clinic were dispatched, in order to deal with difficult cases at the camp. Dr. Carl Clauberg: A famous Berlin surgeon handled the difficult cases that occurred in the camp.  Camp kitchen: One of the largest service buildings in Auschwitz. It had state-of-the-art cooking facilities. There were twelve of these throughout the camp. * The caloric content of the diet was carefully monitored by camp supervisors and Red Cross delegates. It only deteriorated in Auschwitz and other camps towards the end of the war when German railroads and the entire transport system collapsed under constant aerial attacks of the Allies.  Up to 16 camp orchestras with every conceivable instrument available: A camp theater where plays could be performed by camp inmate actors: Camp sculpture classes were available for interested, talented inmates, and were led by professional sculptors. Camp art classes were available for inmates. A university existed at the camp, with lectures given on every topic under the sun: from health, the arts, philosophy, science to economic issues etc. There was also a camp cinema, where every week, different, mainly cultural and non-political films, were shown. The camp brothel, just inside the main gate, was a building used during the war as a brothel for the inmates. It was not a secret that the camp had a brothel; it was mentioned in books, and its existence was confirmed by Auschwitz Museum officials. It was established in the summer of 1943 on Himmler’s order; it was located in Block 24, and was used to reward privileged prisoners.                                A camp library where inmates could borrow books. Forty-five thousand volumes were available: Camp religious facilities were available, and were used on a rotating basis by all denominations at the camp for religious services: Below is a camp swimming pool in Birkenallee for use by the inmates. There were walkways with comfortable benches for inmates to relax on, in the shade of the trees.  Camp sports facilities, like soccer fields, handball areas, fencing classes and other exercise facilities, could be found at the Auschwitz camp.                                   Camp swimming pool (L) and soccer field (R). The camp had a sauna: Here is an Auschwitz map: – Who has a pool at a death camp? – Do you build a hospital next to a gas chamber? – Does the camp’s commander live only 1,200 feet from the gas chamber? – What is a theater doing there? Auschwitz had an artist’s studio: “Art in Auschwitz 1940-1945”: The camp commandant provided a studio and equipment for inmates to use to make art. The studio produced thousands of paintings and sketches. The Auschwitz Museum stores 1,470 paintings, but none, except for a select few, are displayed in the museum.                                     A camp incentive system operated, in which inmates who did extra work could obtain coupons that were redeemable for cake or ice cream in the camp cantina, which also stocked toiletries etc. A camp complaints office, where inmates could register complaints or make suggestions, operated on the camp grounds. Camp Commander Hoess had a standing order that any inmate could approach him personally to register a complaint about other inmates, such as “Kapos”. Camp inmates could even make complaints about guards. * A system of strict discipline for guards and also for inmates operated, with severe punishment being handed out against those found guilty (for even slapping an inmate). Marriages in the Auschwitz camp took place because worker inmates fell in love and married their inmate partners. The camp had a child care center where working mothers could leave their children. In the Auschwitz maternity ward, over 3,000 live births were registered, with not a single infant death recorded while Auschwitz was in operation under German rule: The women’s sections of camps had female guards: Auschwitz jail: Since the camp was a large open facility, transgressors could be arrested, tried and jailed right in Auschwitz. Below is the jail building: Auschwitz issued its own money: Prisoners were paid and could spend the money in canteens, brothels and stores.                                    * Auschwitz crematoria – These structures were hastily built by inmates after the first typhus epidemic caused thousands of deaths. (Burial of epidemic victims had caused the ground water to be contaminated causing infectious diseases among the German staff. Amongst the victims was an early camp commandant’s wife. Polish peasants from the surrounding district were also cremated there.) * Auschwitz pregnancies took place because of the open nature of the facility. Camp post office operated in the camp, with twice-weekly pick-ups and deliveries If people were being gassed to death, would they be allowed to write letters? The International Red Cross visited the camp monthly. In a 1650-page report compiled by the International Red Cross, there was never a single mention of gas chambers. The above was adapted from Real Auschwitz. Source of photos: Holocaust museums.

Real Life in Auschwitz

VIDEO: Bitchute | Youtube | Video is an excerpt from “Soviet Run Death Camps In USSR Vs German Labour Facilities Teaching Inmates Skills” which you can view on Youtube.

Sanitation levels in the camps were high

Bathroom facilities were relatively modern. Flush toilets were provided. There were marble washbasins in the communal bathrooms.

Marble washbasin in bathroom

Flush toilets

After the rebuilding of the camp (Auschwitz), each building had lavatories, usually on the ground floor, containing 22 toilets, urinals, and washbasins with trough-type drains and 42 spigots installed above them.

Central heating of the dormitories

Barrack with central heating flue. At the ends of the flue were stoves.

The camp stove at the end that sent heat through the flue in the floor of the women’s quarters

Each barrack had two stoves with a brick heating flue running between them. This heated the building in winter. Aside from the beds, the furniture in each block included a dozen or more wooden wardrobes, several tables, and several score stools. Coal-fired tile stoves provided the heating.

Graham Hart – Hoax Train

VIDEO: Bitchute

#pohlreport

_________________________________

The Pohl Report: Proof that the Germans ran humane camps

There are two Nuremberg documents that give total concentration camp deaths in the later half of 1942. One is the so-called Pohl Report, 1469-PS. The Pohl Report can be read here. Oswald Pohl was another SS member who was tortured by British interrogators during the Nuremberg Trials but the proof that he was a conscientious camp administrator who was concerned about the prisoners’ welfare is preserved in the document he wrote.

Oswald Pohl

The Pohl Report provides ample evidence that the German National Socialist camps were humanely operated camps. The report comes from Oswald Pohl himself, who was the head of the SS Main Economic and Administrative Office and the head administrator of the concentration camps. In this report, he is writes to Heinrich Himmler about measures to lower the death rate of prisoners and the level of success those measures had brought.

Mortality rate of prisoners was a concern

Although in the month of December the mortality rate was still approximately 10 percent, in January 1943 it fell to 8 percent and continued to fall.

Hygiene and diet were improved successfully to decrease mortality

Pohl writes that certain factors were responsible for reducing the mortality rate. From this report, it seems the Germans were well aware of the importance of vitamins in food, and the ability of certain types of food to provide these.

– Hygienic measures were undertaken
– Amount of raw food was increased
– Cooking food for too long was avoided
– Supplementary rations of sauerkraut and similar foods were given
– Prisoners were allowed to keep their coats on in winter during worktime
– Unnecessarily long roll calls were avoided during winter
– Prisoners were permitted to have individual food shipments (probably International Red Cross parcels)

Documents produced in the Nuremberg Trials show that the diet of prisoners was a concern for camp administrators and Hitler’s SS to the extent that they added sauerkraut, a good source of vitamins, to prisoners’ meals, and even gave cooking classes to the prisoners.

The camp administrators also experimented with yeast preparations, a good source of B12 vitamin, in improving the health of the inmates.

Vitam-R is a savory yeast extract spread made in Hameln, Germany, by the company Vitam Hefe-Produkt GmbH. It was first developed by Rückforth AG in Stettin (today’s Szczecin, Poland) in 1925 following the discovery by Justus von Liebig that yeast could be concentrated.

Special cooking courses for prisoners

The prisoners in the Dachau camp were given special cooking courses, and this had contributed to the improved nutrition of the prisoners. A new cooking course was planned.

Berlin, 9/30/1943 […] Reich Leader: Although in the month of December the mortality rate was still approximately 10 percent, in January 1943 it fell to 8 percent and continued to fall. This reduction in the mortality rate is due primarily to the fact that the hygienic measures which have long been demanded have now been carried out, at least to a larger extent. Furthermore, it has been ordered in the field of nutrition that one-third of the food, raw and properly chopped, be added shortly before distribution, to the cooked food. Cooking too long has been avoided. Supplementary rations of sauerkraut and similar foods have been issued. In regard to clothing, it has been ordered that the prisoners may keep their coats on in the winter, insofar as their work permits. Unnecessary prolongation of roll calls has also been avoided. Permitting prisoners to receive food shipments individually has had a favorable effect. The experiments with the distribution of yeast preparation were also favorable. The above measures were aided by the fact that selected prisoners were incorporated in a special cooking course in the training kitchen at Dachau. It is intended to conduct a new cooking course in the near future.”

Himmler replied to Pohl, thanking him for his efforts in reducing the death toll of prisoners

Heinrich Himmler wrote back to Pohl about a week later after receiving the report. In this letter, he expresses his gratitude for Pohl’s and his co-workers’ efforts in achieving a significant reduction in the death toll. Himmler also says that better sewerage and other sanitary installations will improve the situation even further.

Subject: Deaths in concentration camps. Reference: Your letter of 9/30/1943Ch./Po/Ha-VS No. 933/43 I received your report of 9/30/1943 concerning death in concentration camps and can only more express to you and your co-workers my thanks and my gratitude for the result achieved. I am convinced that the latest difficulties will also decrease to the extent when sewerage and better sanitary installations are possible. [Signed] H. H.

_________________________________

More documentary evidence that the Germans operated labor camps and not execution camps

“The SS Reichsfuehrer has ordered that the death rate absolutely must be reduced”

This document was also produced in the Nuremberg Trials. It is a copy of a letter from the SS Main Office of Economic Administration that was sent to all concentration camps. In it, the SS officer expresses the concern that the death rate is too high and advises that the death rate must be reduced at all costs, including by better supervision of the food, improving the working conditions, and by increasing inspections by doctors of work places.

The best doctor, the SS officer writes, is the one who with “his supervision and exchange keeps the working capacity at the various labor commands at the highest possible level”. From this, it can be seen that a high level of productivity at the camps was desirable for the administrators – further proof that the camps were labor camps.

TO the 1. Camp Doctors of the concentration Camps Da., Sh. Bu., Neu., Au., Rav., Flo., Lu., Stu., Gr-Ro., Nied., Natz., Hinz., Mor., Herzog., Mau., Copy to the Camp Commandants. In the inclosed a compilation of the current arrivals and departures in all the concentration camps is sent to you for your information. It discloses that out of 136,000 arrivals about 70,000 died. With such a high rate of death the number of the prisoners can never be brought up to the figure as has been ordered by the Reichsfuehrer of the SS. The 1. camp doctors must use all means at their disposal to reduce essentially this death rate in the various camps. The best doctor in a concentration camp is not the one, who believes that he must stand out for uncalled severity, but the one who by his supervision and exchange keeps the working capacity at the various labor commands at the highest possible level. The camp doctors must supervise more often than in the past the food of the prisoners and, with the approval of the administration, submit improvement proposals to the camp commandants. These, however, must not only appear on paper, but must be controlled regularly by the camp doctors. Furthermore, the camp doctors are to see to it that the working conditions at the various labor places are improved as much as possible. To this purpose it will be necessary that the camp doctors inspect the labor places on the ground and convince themselves about the conditions of work. The SS Reichsfuehrer has ordered that the death rate absolutely must be reduced. For this reason the aforementioned has been ordered and a monthly report on this matter is to be submitted to the Chief of the Department D III. The first report to be submitted on 1 February 1943. [Signature illegible] Klueder[?] SS Brigadefuehrer and Major general of the Arms Survey For the month of June-November 1942

Concentration camp prisoners could receive food packages from family and friends

Letter written by a concentration inmate thanking his benefactor for sending a food parcel to him and asking for more chocolate to be sent to him. (Click to enlarge.)

In October 1942, Himmler ordered that prisoners be able to receive packages from outside. Preserved letters sent by inmates to benefactors attest to the fact that prisoners did receive food packages from family and friends.

A parcel receipt from Auschwitz. Link

Red Cross packed 9,000 food parcels for concentration camps daily

Red Cross food parcel like the ones that were sent to the German camps

In addition to the external supply of food sent by family and friends on the outside, the Red Cross also delivered packages of food to concentration camp prisoners. The Red Cross report on its activities during World War II states that “As many as 9,000 parcels were packed daily. From the autumn of 1943 until May 1945, about 1,112,000 parcels […] were sent off to the concentration camps.” (Vol. III, p. 80).

Red Cross parcels were sent to concentration camps in Germany, Austria and Poland

Red Cross parcel that contains Scottish herrings, chocolate, Nestle’s condensed milk, biscuits, minced collops (meat slices), apple puree, eggs, processed cheese, black currant puree, honey, and tobacco.

“Parcels were sent to Dachau, Buchenwald, Sangerhausen, Sachsenhausen, Oranienburg, Flossenburg, Landsberg-am-Lech, Flöha, Ravensbrück, Hamburg-Neuengamme, Mauthausen, Theresienstadt, Auschwitz, Bergen-Belsen, to camps near Vienna and in Central and Southern Germany. The principal recipients were Belgians, Dutch, French, Greeks, Italians, Norwegians, Poles and stateless Jews” (Vol. III, p. 83). http://www.australiafreepress.org (site that was owned by Fredrick Töben and is now banned by Australian government)

________________________________

Bergen-Belsen camp became flooded with prisoners who were running away from the Soviets

There are many pictures of Bergen-Belsen at the time of “liberation” by the Americans. They allegedly show the cruelty of the Germans, as in the pictures there are many starving people as well as dead people. However, it should be taken into account that Bergen-Belsen was a transit camp – that is, a camp that received prisoners who were en route to another destination. Towards the end of WWII, as the Germans were losing and were being chased westward by the Red Army, the camps out east were evacuated. The camp staff gave prisoners a choice of staying put and being “liberated” by the Soviets or heading west with the camp staff. The prisoners overwhelmingly preferred to follow the Germans back to Germany. The German staff, therefore, took the prisoners with them (and at the same time assumed the responsibility of feeding them and caring for them), and the Great Migration began.

It should be noted that the Germans could have abandoned the prisoners and left it up to the Soviets to deal with them. Many Soviet prisoners who did indeed end up back in Soviet hands were sent to the gulags on repatriation.

Many of the fleeing German staff and camp prisoners arrived at the transit camp of Bergen-Belsen, which was not equipped to handle the number of prisoners that flooded in, and as a consequence, the camp became overcrowded. There were critical shortages of food too at that time due to the relentless bombing by the Allies that cut supply lines.

All of this contributed to outbreak of disease (this camp was where Anne Frank died). Subsequently, when the Americans arrived at the camp, the sight of dying and dead prisoners greeted them.

Camp doctors and nurses are washing down patients in the Bergen-Belsen camp to reduce the incidence of disease

_________________________________

American internment camps vs German internment camps

America, unlike Germany, remained relatively unscathed during the war. There were no food shortages. Its supply routes were not being bombed like Germany’s was. Farms could produce food without any interference. There were no labor shortages in agriculture that affected the food supply significantly. DDT kept the lice problem under control and fewer incidents of typhus occurred in America compared to Europe.

In contrast, Germany became a war zone in the last couple of years of the Second World War. As Germany started to lose territory and lose the war against the Allies that now included the Soviet Union, it came under increasing attack by bombardment, that interrupted agricultural activities as well as damaged supply routes for distribution of food to cities. Also, as German migrants from other areas began to pour into Germany, Germany’s food situation grew even more precarious. Many people suffered food shortages across Germany even though they were not interned in camps.

Lack of inadequate nutrition lowers resistance to disease in humans, causing people to fall ill more easily with infectious diseases such as typhus, typhoid, and cholera. In the pre-antibiotic era age, there was no drug treatment available to cure these diseases. Medical care was not as advanced in the 1940s as it is now.

Illnesses such as typhus makes people lose a lot of weight, and sufferers then enter a vicious circle of lowered immunity due to illness, with further worsening of the illness leading to more weight loss, and so on.

This spiral of illness and wasting results in emaciation, a common sight observed in the dead bodies of the inmates of the internment camps of the Germans. The skeletal appearance of the corpses gives a clue to what caused the deaths: disease. And typhus was the most probable diagnosis in a majority of cases as typhus was the most prevalent infectious disease causing death and serious illness at that time.

Notably the bodies show an absence of torture or other abuse. There is no disfigurement of the faces or body parts.

The high mortality rate of typhus can be attributed to the fact that there was no definitive drug cure for typhus back in those days, unlike now.

Furthermore, there is no evidence that the camps had a policy of deliberately starving inmates. Rather, there is evidence that the opposite case prevailed. A document containing an order for camp commanders to increase the food intake of the inmates in order to reduce the death rate was found.

Despite the fact that there are many pictures in wide circulation (some of them faked) showing emaciated bodies piled up in a heap in the camps, on liberation from the camps, many of the inmates were healthy-looking and of normal weight. Photos taken by the Allies of the liberation attest to this. It is hard to believe that the photographers took only photos of newcomers who did not have a chance to suffer the alleged abuse at the hands of the camp commanders. Most likely, these photographs show the general camp population, and from the photos, the people in them, of all ages and of both sexes, look normal weight (and even some of them look overweight) and healthy.

The standard of medical care in the camp was high under the circumstances. Not a single case of mortality was registered among the 3000 live births in the maternity center of the Auschwitz camp.

This picture of health of the majority of the camp population, of course, contrasts with the emaciated appearance of sick inmates and the skeletal appearances of the corpses. However, the loss of weight is unlikely to have been due to deliberate selective starvation. It would not make sense for camp commanders to deliberately starve some inmates but not other inmates. The camps served as a holding facility for political prisoners and as work camps to produce munitions for Nazi Germany’s army.

The camps served a similar function as the American concentration camps, which also used them to segregate one ethnic group of people, the Japanese, from the rest of the population. Such camps also existed in Australia and Canada. They housed Italian and German people, among other nationalities. In the American camps, inmates also did labor in the camps.

The main difference among the camps of the Allied nations and the German ones was that Germany was in a war zone and America, Canada and Australia were not. This fact had a big impact on the conditions inside the camps, especially in the latter part of the war. Conditions inside the German internment camps deteriorated significantly, reflecting the worsening conditions outside the camps, and this produced a parallel deterioration in the health condition of the inmates.

However, German internment camps actively tried to reduce the morbidity and mortality rate of camp inmates by instituting measures such as performing delousing of the clothes and personal belongings of inmates. The caloric intake of inmates was also increased. It would have been against the Germans’ interests to have wantonly killed inmates since Germany needed the inmates to make munitions for the military.

Despite this, the death toll of inmates from typhus began to increase as the war progressed and started to rage on German territory. The people who lived in surrounding villages also began to die in high numbers. The dead people from outside the camps were brought into the camp for cremation and for burial.

It is a testament to the efforts of the camp commanders that many inmates were released from the camps on liberation in good health, with no signs of starvation or disease, even though Germany was a war zone, with many parts of Germany devastated by the Allied bombing, which caused the deaths of many people outside the camps.

The situation in America could not have been any more different to the one in Germany. America was not a war zone. Food production and distribution were not interrupted and life could go on much the same as normal. Hence, the people in the American internment camps passed the war with little impact to their health.

If Germans are to be blamed for the “crime” of interning Jews, gypsies and other ethnicities and their political prisoners, Americans (and other members of the Allied Nations) are to be equally blamed for interning Japanese citizens and other nationalities during the war.

American internment camps for Japanese prisoners* *People with even one-sixteenth Japanese ancestry were interned. Orphaned infants with Japanese ancestry were also interned in the American prison camps.  Above: Minidoka internment camp in Idaho: nearly 9,500 Japanese Americans from surrounding areas were interned here.  Above: Orders to relocate Above: A school room in an internment camp.   Above:  A Japanese family returns home after internment to find their home vandalized. Above:  Japanese Americans in a camp.  Above:  A mess hall in an internment camp.  Above:  Japanese classical dance, 1940s, Gila River concentration camp, Arizona. Courtesy of Jōrōkushō Kineya  Above:  A sign that tells Japanese to “keep moving” and to “keep out”.  Above:  A cattle truck bringing Japanese-Americans to the internment camp.  Above:  New arrivals in a cattle truck.  Above:  Bunk beds in an internment camp.  Above:  Italian-Australians were also kept in concentration camps in Australia.  Above:  An American soldier stands guard at a concentration camp in Tule Lake, CA.  Above:  A man looks through the barbed wire fence at a camp.  Above:  Workers laboring in the fields in Manzanar Camp. Like Germany, Japanese prisoners were made to perform labor.  Above:  A Japanese-owned store closing because of moving to internment camp.  Above:  Separated by a barb wire fence.  Above:  Young men playing basketball at a camp.  Above:  Topaz Camp in the Utah desert.  Above:  Arriving at the camp in Tule Lake.  Above: Guard tower at Tule Lake.  Above: Map showing camp locations.  Above: Elderly men slept in the gymnasium. Each internee was allotted 42 inches of space.  Above: Under Executive Order 9066, 110,000 Japanese Americans were interned.  Above: Temporary barracks in an internment camp.

(Part I of “Debunking the Holocaust” is here.)

#eisenhower

_________________________________________

Eisenhower’s Death Camps

Death camp at Rheinwisenlager. The Rheinwisenlager were a group of 19 camps built by the Americans in Germany to hold German soldiers. It held between 1-2 million soldiers who had surrendered at the end of WW2. An estimated 1.7 million inmates starved to death in these camps.

More died in American camps (1.7 million) than died in German camps (270,000)

Official Red Cross records show that around 270,000 people (271,301) died in German camps during WW2. Ninety-nine percent of American prisoners were safely returned to American hands at the end of the war. In contrast, 1.7 million Germans died in US camps that were set up at the end of WW2.

Eisenhower deliberately starved millions of German prisoners to death. His administration also did not provide shelter to the prisoners, who were therefore exposed to the elements, and deprived of their basic human rights. Facilities were basic, such as a ditch for a latrine.

Eisenhower was able to circumvent the Geneva Protocols concerning the treatment of POWS by calling the German soldiers and actually ALL German civilians “disarmed enemy forces”. Using this designation, Eisenhower withheld food, water and other basic necessities to the POWs in the camps. He also blocked inspections of the camps by the International Red Cross, as did the French and the British.

Eisenhower Death Camps

VIDEO: Narrated by Deanna Spingola BitChute

A prison guard remembers: Martin Brech’s story

A US prison guard recounts his experience of working in one of Eisenhower’s death camps. He witnessed many horrific things while there, such as the prisoners being given starvation rations. At one time, Brech tried to help the prisoners by throwing food over the fence but he almost got shot for his efforts.

Such acts of cruelty in this place where the German prisoners, that included women amongst them, were all too common. These factors contributed to the horrendous death toll of 1.7 million prisoners, a fact that is not talked about in the mainstream media.

Even more shocking was to see the prisoners throwing grass and weeds into a tin can containing a thin soup. They told me they did this to help ease their hunger pains. Quickly they grew emaciated. Dysentery raged, and soon they were sleeping in their own excrement, too weak and crowded to reach the slit trenches.

In ‘Eisenhower’s Death Camps’: A U.S. Prison Guard Remembers Martin Brech In October 1944, at age eighteen, I was drafted into the U.S. army. Largely because of the “Battle of the Bulge,” my training was cut short, my furlough was halved, and I was sent overseas immediately. Upon arrival in Le Havre, France, we were quickly loaded into box cars and shipped to the front. When we got there, I was suffering increasingly severe symptoms of mononucleosis, and was sent to a hospital in Belgium. Since mononucleosis was then known as the “kissing disease,” I mailed a letter of thanks to my girlfriend. By the time I left the hospital, the outfit I had trained with in Spartanburg, South Carolina, was deep inside Germany, so, despite my protests, I was placed in a “repo depot” (replacement depot) … Read more at Institute for Historical Review

_________________________________________

#hitler

It’s hard to believe an animal-lover and anti-vivisectionist would indiscriminately massacre people

Nazi Preservation of Environment and Animals Under the Nazi regime, mishandling an animal was considered a heinous crime, and if somebody was discovered mistreating an animal, they were sent to concentration camps. As someone with great admiration for animals, Hitler showed great concern for animals native to Germany, and passed laws that ensured their safety and well-being. In 1934, Hitler passed a law called Das Reichsjagdgesetz (the Reich Hunting Law), which regulated how many animals could be killed per year, and to establish proper ‘hunting seasons’. This law has now been adopted by most western countries. Animal conservation was included in Primary, Secondary and College levels, and in 1935, the Reichsnaturschutzgesetz (Reich Nature Protection Act) was passed. which placed several native species on a protection list including the wolf and Eurasian lynx. It is likely that this law saved some native forest-inhabiting species from going extinct. The Nazi’s were also the first to create environmental protection laws in history. The German Imperial Conservation law of 1935 was passed, which protected “remaining portions of landscape in free nature whose preservation on account of rarity, beauty, distinctiveness or on account of scientific, ethnic, forest, or hunting significance lies in the general interest.” “[It is] useful to know the laws of nature – for that enables us to obey them. To act otherwise would be to rise in revolt against heaven.”– Adolf Hitler Hitler was a well-known lover of animals. Hitler Banned Experimentation on Animals (Vivisection) Nazy Germany was the first country in the world to ban vivisection, or any experimentation on live animals. With its great concern for animal conservation, and humane treatment, a complete ban of vivisection was enacted in April 1933. The Prime Minister of Prussia Hermann Goring has said: “An absolute and permanent ban on vivisection is not only a necessary law to protect animals and to show sympathy with their pain, but it is also a law for humanity itself…. I have therefore announced the immediate prohibition of vivisection and have made the practice a punishable offense in Prussia. Until such time as punishment is pronounced the culprit shall be lodged in a concentration camp.” FIG. 5.2. “Heil Goring!” The lab animals of Germany saluting Hermann Goring for his order barring vivisection. The Reichsmarschall in August of 1933 announced an end to the “unbearable torture and suffering in animal experiments” and threatened to commit to concentration camps “those who still think they can treat animals as inanimate property.” Source: Kladderadatsch, September 3, 1933, with thanks to Phil Jenkins.  A cartoon showing animals saved from vivisection saluting Hermann Goring. The sign in the window says “Vivisection Forbidden”. This German cartoon depicts animals that were saved from vivisection saluting Hermann Goring. The sign in the window reads “Vivisection Forbidden”. Reproduced from: Redice TV: Things you were not told about Nazi Germany

_________________________________

“One-Third of the Holocaust”

This is a series of 30 short videos that examine about three concentration camps or one-third of the concentration camps involved in housing political prisoners in Nazi Germany. The evidence contained in the video vignettes shows that the claims of the people who say a “holocaust” of Jews occurred, including the claim that six million Jews died, is a myth.”One Third of the Holocaust”

Watch the videos here.

http://www.holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=1001

You can either watch the thirty videos separately, or watch them as Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3. Or you can watch all thirty videos in the one movie.

Start with Video 6: Gassing Chambers.

____________________________________________

Blocking free speech: The Anti-Semitism Awareness Bill

Questioning the veracity of the claims about the “Holocaust”may become illegal in the future if this bill gets passed:

https://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2016/12/02/anti-semitism-awareness-bill-passes-senate

The Anti-Semitism Awareness Bill bans:

• Calling for, aiding or justifying the killing or harming of Jews
• Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust
• Demonizing Israel by blaming it for all interreligious or political tensions
• Judge Israel by a double standard that one would not apply to any other democratic nation

What does Charlie’s Angels have to do with the Holohoax? Watch Episode 19 and find out.

http://www.holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=1001

(Part I of “Debunking the Holocaust” is here.)

_______________________________

“Tales of the Holohoax” – A Journal of Satire

Link to the “Tales of the Holohoax” cartoon. Even though it is a satirical piece that mocks the Holocaust myth, it uses sound science to do so. Simon Sheppard, who was one of the first to publish these cartoons on the Internet, was imprisoned in England for doing so. More about him below in the Holocaust Truthtellers section.

Front page of the satire. Note that the lampshade comment is referring to the now debunked claim that the Germans made lampshades out of human skin of prisoners.

#lampshade

Debunked claims are still being spread as fact

The claim was put forward at the Nuremberg Trials that lampshades had been made out of the skin of prisoners in the camps. Prosecutors played a film made by American Hollywood director George Stevens before the court. This film showed a lampshade purportedly made of human skin. No actual lampshade was exhibited in court.

Although the claim was accepted at first as being true and the woman (Ilse Koch) accused of doing this was sentenced to life imprisonment, the sentence was later commuted to 4 years by the military governor of the American Zone, General Lucius Clay, when it was found that the accused perpetrator had never possessed any lampshades made of human skin. She had already been thoroughly investigated by the German National Socialists earlier during the war after rumors of human skin lampshades had first surfaced.

Even historians like Deborah Lipschadt who support the mass gassing story reject the notion that the Germans had made lampshades out of human skin.

Despite this, the story of lampshades made out of human skin is still circulated as fact by many people today and is used to demonize German National Socialists and Hitler.

The “human-skin lampshades” tale Extract taken from: Did the Germans Get a Fair Trial at Nuremberg? The claim was put before the Tribunal in a film made by Hollywood director George Stevens. […] Here is some background on the woman actually accused of having prisoners killed to make lampshades from their skins. In late 1943 Ilse Koch’s husband, former Buchenwald commandant Karl Koch (at the time, transferred to Majdanek) was investigated by the SS and eventually sentenced to death for embezzlement and the murder of three prisoners at Buchenwald. Ilse was investigated at the same time on a charge of concealing stolen property, but was acquitted for lack of evidence. After the war, Ilse Koch was accused by the Allies of having caused prisoners at Buchenwald to be killed so that she could have items made from their tattooed skins. There was a credibility-problem with this accusation from the beginning because SS-judge Konrad Morgen, who had sentenced her husband to death for killing prisoners, had also investigated her and found no such thing. She had not been at Buchenwald since 1943. Ilse Koch was tried with 30 others before an American military court in 1947, the so-called Dachau Trial, where she was convicted and received a life sentence. The following year, the military governor of the American Zone, General Lucius Clay, commuted her sentence to 4 years, explaining that “there was no convincing evidence that she had selected inmates for extermination in order to secure tattooed skins, or that she possessed any articles made of human skin.” More: National Vanguard

Similarly, the story of soap made from human fat has been debunked and is not taken seriously by historians (on both sides of the Holocaust debate) today. The only “evidence” put forth for the existence of soap made from human fat has been prisoners’ testimonies.

The “soap made from human fat” tale Extract taken from: Did the Germans Get a Fair Trial at Nuremberg? A rumor spread that cheap soap mass-produced by the Germans and distributed in concentration camps during the war was made from Jewish fat. The soap bore the letters RJF, which was alleged to stand for reines juedisches Fett — Pure Jewish Fat […] In fact, the letters were RIF (capital I and capital J in the old Fraktur script being identical), an entirely innocent acronym representing Reichsstelle für industrielle Fettversorgung — Reich’s Center for Industrial Fat-Provisioning. […] During the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg the story of soap made from human fat was pushed especially by Soviet prosecutors. What was the evidence? There were former Auschwitz-internees who apparently had heard the rumor about it and believed it, and there were affidavits from three men who said that they had worked at the Danzig Anatomic Institute where, they claimed, some soap had been produced. […] The Danzig Anatomic Institute directed by Dr. Rudolf Spanner had legitimate reasons for dealing with cadavers. German Wikipedia states that this was a place where autopsies were performed. It was not a soap-factory. […] The Judgement of the Tribunal is worded in such a way as to avoid committing to the soap-rumor, without clearly stating that it was wrong. The result was that the rumor of industrial production of soap from Jewish fat continued to live on. […] In any case the story is now rejected by mainstream Holocaustography. Walter Laqueur, in The Terrible Secret (1980), wrote: “It emerged after the war that the [soap] story was in fact untrue.” Yehuda Bauer (an Israeli professor of Holocaust Studies) has even claimed: “… the overwhelming majority of Holocaust historians have never believed that the Nazis mass produced human soap.” [Y. Bauer, “The Soap Allegations”] […] the man who had supposedly ordered and supervised this activity, Dr. Rudolf Spanner, was never prosecuted. More: National Vanguard

#paulrassinier

#jewishholocaustdeniers

Part I of “Debunking the Holocaust” is here.

_____________________________________

Holocaust Revisionists: Modern-day Gallileos who risked everything to tell the truth

Not all Holocaust revisionists or “deniers” are Gentiles or national socialists. Quite a few are Jewish and communists. Paul Rassinier was a Jewish French communist in the resistance movement who got caught by the Germans and was sent to a concentration camp. He says the prisoners were treated humanely, and that there was no gassing of prisoners.

David Cole is an American Jewish revisionist. He exposed the holes in the Holocaust story in his film, “David Cole in Auschwitz”, but after pressure from the Jewish community, he changed his mind and said the Holocaust did happen. However, he is now back to firmly “denying” the Holocaust.

Lenni Brenner is another Jew who “denies” the Holocaust. A communist, Brenner’s focus is on the collaboration of the Zionists with the German National Socialists and how the imprisonment of Jews in the German camps and their persecution benefited the aims of the Zionists, which included establishing a homeland for Jews in Israel. To achieve this aim, they had to force Jews in Europe to go to Israel.

There is also Horst Mahler, who belatedly disccovered his Jewish heritage. He is a former communist who has been imprisoned for more than twelve years for Holocaust “denial” in Germany.

In Germany, truth is no defense in Holocaust denial trials. So, even if your testimony about the Holocaust is verifiably true, and is backed by science, and scientific expert witnesses, who have been called to testify on your behalf, support your claims, and even in some cases, pro-Holocaust historians do so as well, simply making statements that are different to the official narrative (“six million Jews died”, etc) can see you hauled before a court, tried, and sentenced to lengthy imprisonment.

Mahler recently escaped from Germany and sought asylum in Hungary, but his request for asylum was rejected by the Hungarian government. It looks as if he will spend more time in prison for Holocaust denial.

Sixteen nations have laws on the books that you cannot state anything that goes against the official Holocaust narrative or else you will be prosecuted and experience jail time. And many have.

Voltaire, the famous French writer and wit, said: “To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.”

Below is listed only some of the well-known Holocaust revisionists. A more extensive list can be found at Revisionists. Another good resource on revisionists and revisionism can be found at The Gas Chambers Hoax.

All of the revisionists have suffered persecution for speaking out about the so-called Holocaust, and for debunking the falsehoods spread about German camps. The cancel culture, as it is called today, has been exerted in full force against the Holocaust researchers. In addition to this, many of the revisionists have been imprisoned.

Physical attacks on Holocaust revisionists have been numerous. There are is even a case of suspected murder of a Polish Holocaust revisionist by Mossad. Robert Faurisson has been assaulted 10x. The assaults are done not only to punish the revisionists for speaking out, but to also threaten other people about what could happen to them if they do the same. Police raids are also used to persecute Holocaust revisionists.

Paul Rassinier Paul Rassinier Paul Rassinier is the generally acknowledged founder of scholarly Holocaust revisionism. Born in France on March 18, 1906, and trained as an educator, he taught history and geography at the secondary school in Faubourg de Montbeliard. During the Second World War, he co-founded the “Libé-Nord” underground Resistance organization, which helped smuggle Jews from German-occupied France into Switzerland. As a result, he was arrested by the Gestapo in October 1943 and deported to Germany, where he was held prisoner until the end of the war in Buchenwald and Dora concentration camps. After returning home, the French government recognized his courage and suffering with the highest decoration awarded for Resistance activities. He was also elected to the French National Assembly as a deputy of the Socialist party (SFIO). Rassinier was profoundly distressed by the many lies and myths about the concentration camps that were being circulated. He wrote: “Then one day I realized that a false picture of the German camps had been created and that the problem of the concentration camps was a universal one, not just one that could be disposed of by placing it on the doorstep of the National Socialists. The deportees — many of whom were Communists — had been largely responsible for leading international political thinking to such an erroneous conclusion. I suddenly felt that by remaining silent I was an accomplice to a dangerous influence.” […] Read more: Revisionists: Paul Rassinier

Robert Faurisson For more than 30 years, French scholar Robert Faurisson was known as an intrepid, intellectually formidable, and courageous critic of the familiar Holocaust narrative. His extensive writings and many lectures, which were based on considerable research and study, enraged powerful enemies who waged a fierce, relentless campaign to silence him. Robert Faurisson Regarded as Europe’s foremost Holocaust revisionist scholar, he was perhaps most renowned, and notorious, for his view that there was no systematic mass extermination of Jews in gas chambers during World War II. On the basis of controversial “Holocaust denial” laws that selectively criminalize dissident views on this emotion-laden subject, French authorities repeatedly brought him to court, where he was punished with fines and prison sentences. Following his death, a tribute to this “intrepid and indomitable man” was published in the French periodical Rivarol. “… Robert Faurisson threatened powerful interests,” wrote Jérôme Bourbon. “Those of the State of Israel and international Zionism whose power, durability, immunity and impunity are essentially based on the Holocaust Dogma. Those of the Allies and the sacrosanct crusade of the democracies against the Axis forces. Those of leftists of all stripes for whom it is necessary that the nationalist regimes of the inter-war period in Europe are absolute evil, but not Communism in all its forms, Leninist, Stalinist, Maoist, Trotskyist.” Faurisson not only “threatened the ideological foundations of the world order resulting from the last war,” Bourbon continued, “but he challenged a real religion, or rather a counter-religion, Holocaust worship … The death of this giant, of this monument, is an irreparable loss. We have not finished measuring how much he will miss. For how many men are there today of his temper, his erudition, his talent, his bravery, his tenacity? And yet even without him the fight for historical truth must continue.” […] Read more: Revisionists: Robert Faurisson

Link to Faurisson’s work.

Arthur R. Butz Arthur R. Butz Background: Dr. Arthur R. Butz was born and raised in New York City. He received his Bachelor of Science and Master of Science degrees in Electrical Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. In 1965 he received his doctorate in Control Sciences from the University of Minnesota. In 1966 he joined the faculty of Northwestern University (Evanston, Illinois), where he is now Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences. Dr. Butz is the author of numerous technical papers. Since 1980 he has been a member of the Editorial Advisory Committee of The Journal of Historical Review, published by the Institute for Historical Review. Dr. Butz is the author of The Hoax of the Twentieth Century: The case against the presumed extermination of European Jewry. This book is available from Noontide Press. […] More: Revisionists: Arthur R. Butz

Ernst Zundel Ernst Zundel (1939-2017) was a German-born publisher, author and civil rights activist. He was a prominent figure in the worldwide Holocaust revisionist network, and accordingly was routinely described in the mainstream media as a “notorious Holocaust denier.” He was also an unabashed admirer of Adolf Hitler, and an unapologetic defender of the legacy of Third Reich Germany. For seven years he was held behind bars, first in Canada and then in Germany, solely for the peaceful expression of non-conformist views. For some time he was the most prominent political prisoner in the western world. Ernest Zundel with Ingrid Rimland at an IHR conference, May 2000 He was the author of countless booklets, newsletters and essays. He was a prodigious publisher, a one-man public relations firm, and an able public speaker and organizer. Energetic, tenacious and courageous, he was dauntless in struggle against apparently insurmountable odds and seemingly invincible adversaries. Sometimes describing himself as a “Swabian peasant,” Zundel was an outgoing, good-humored man who was blessed with a rare combination of unflagging optimism and practical ability. He maintained this infectious spirit even under very trying conditions. Although he was often portrayed by adversaries as a boorish “hater,” his real personality was quite different. He was an unusually alert and sensitive individual with a keen understanding of human nature. He knew how to persuade, cajole and encourage others to give their best for a greater mission. He inspired confidence, loyalty and affection. […] More: Revisionists: Ernest Zundel

Link to Ernest Zundel’s work.

David Irving David Irving David Irving, the controversial British historian, is the author of numerous books on military history and World War II, including several international bestsellers. On November 11, 2005, he was arrested during a visit in Austria for the “thought crime” – committed in 1989 (!) – of having referred to “mythical” gas chambers at Auschwitz . Denied bail, he was held in jail until his trial on February 20, 2006, when a court in Vienna sentenced him to three years in prison for having “denied the Holocaust.” In the aftermath of the trial, newspapers, political leaders and intellectuals around the world spoke out against the sentence, as well as against the laws in Europe under which he and other dissidents have been imprisoned and fined for “Holocaust denial” (The only voices of approval were the predictable Zionist ones.) While Irving is perhaps the most prominent “thought criminal” in the western world today, his case is by no means unique. In several European countries, as well as in Israel, “Holocaust denial” is a crime. The list of those who have been imprisoned, fined or forced into exile for expressing skepticism about the official Holocaust story is a long one, and includes Robert Faurisson, Roger Garaudy and Georges Theil in France, Siegfried Verbeke in Belgium, Jürgen Graf and Gaston-Armand Amaudruz in Switzerland, and Günter Deckert, Hans Schmidt and Fredrick Toben in Germany. […] More: Revisionists: David Irving

Germar Rudolf Germar Rudolf Background: This brilliant, German-trained chemist re-examined Auschwitz, Birkenau and other installations and buildings, testing rocks, soil and other physical samples for traces of Zyklon B. Following the pioneering work of Fred Leuchter, he put the final nail into the coffin of the Auschwitz story. Even though he did scientific work and was utterly apolitical, Rudolf’s home and office were raided, computers seized etc. He was charged and tried in Germany for not believing in the standard Auschwitz story. As a scientist, he found the “gassing” claims to be scientifically untenable and, therefore, absurd. A modern day Galileo, Rudolf was found guilty and convicted because he refused to renounce scientific facts and his own scientific tests and findings. He was facing jail when he went into exile with his young wife and two babies. He now edits and publishes devastating refutations of the Allied Propaganda claims in a German-language journal. The Holocaust Enforcers are dogging his steps, and he faces endless hassles and trials, should the “German” vassal authorities ever get a hold of him. Zündel expert witness in chemistry in the Munich trial in 1991 — disallowed by the judge at the request of the prosecution. Repercussions: Accused, tried and convicted in Germany. Career and doctorate dissertation ruined. Driven into exile. […] More: Revisionists: Germar Rudolf

link to Rudolf’s work.

link to Rudolf’s quotes.

Fredrick Töben Fredrick Töben Background German in origin, Dr. Fredrick Töben was raised in Australia as an Australian citizen, and speaks both English and German. Becoming interested in exonerating the German people from the anti-German racism of the Holocaust legend, he at first edited a revisionist journal called Truth Missions, which was later renamed Adelaide Institute Newsletter. He then broadened out to establish Australia’s revisionist website, Adelaide Institute. He has personally visited the site of Auschwitz and burrowed under the ruins of the alleged gas chamber, being unable to find the four holes in the roof which were supposedly used to throw in gas pellets. He conducted regular dialogue with Exterminationists. Repercussions: Töben was unexpectedly arrested during an April 1999 visit with Prosecutor Klein in Mannheim, Germany, for a private discussion on the Holocaust laws in Germany, which make it mandatory to accept the entire Holocaust story. […] More: Revisionists: Fredrick Töben

Link to Toben’s quotes and findings.

Carlos Whitlock Porter Carlos Whitlock Porter Background: An American ex-patriate, skilled linguist and translator living in Belgium and author of numerous books — “Not Guilty at Nuremberg”, “Made in Russia: The Holocaust” subtitled “The German Defenses Case” — Porter was charged by the Germans in 1997. He refused to attend the trial, was tried in absentia and convicted. He responded with a defiant, blistering Emile Zola-like excoriating written counterattack to the judge in his case, and presently is waiting to be arrested and taken to Germany to serve his sentence there. Repercussions: Charged, tried in absentia, and convicted in Germany. […] More: Revisionists: Carlos Whitlock Porter

Fred A. Leuchter, Jr. Fred A. Leuchter, Jr. Background: Fred A. Leuchter, Jr., is the foremost expert on the design and fabrication of hardware, including homicidal gas chambers, used to execute convicted criminals in the United States. After receiving a Bachelor’s degree (in history) from Boston University in 1964, Leuchter did postgraduate work at the Harvard Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory. He holds patents on the design of sextants, surveying instruments and optical encoding equipment. He is an accomplished pianist and an NRA-qualified small-arms instructor. Leuchter is perhaps best known as the author of two controversial forensic reports on alleged German wartime extermination gas chambers. Leuchter designed and maintained gas chambers for several U.S. penal institutions. He was sent by Ernst Zündel to investigate Auschwitz, Majdanek, Dachau, Hartheim and other alleged “Nazi Death Camps” and “gassing facilities.” Author of the devastating series of Leuchter Reports. (I, II, III, IV) and many articles and videotaped presentations that resulted from these investigations. Sensational Zündel witness in the Great Holocaust Trial in 1988. Repercussions: Leuchter was blacklisted in the U.S. and hounded by the Holocaust lobby and the world’s lapdog media. He was arrested and jailed in Germany while visiting there to appear on a television show. As a result of intense Jewish pressure, Leuchter lost his livelihood. Since making known his findings, he also has been libelled, slandered, and financially ruined.[…] More: Revisionists: Fred A. Leuchter, Jr.

Günter Deckert Günter Deckert Background: A German educator, party leader, writer, public speaker and publicist, Deckert won fame for being tried and convicted after he simultaneously translated an English-language lecture by Fred Leuchter in Germany into German. He was at first acquitted by a German judge who found him to be an upright and decent patriot, then recharged and convicted by a different judge after an artificially created international media uproar. Now German prosecutors keep piling court case after court case on Deckert while he is in jail. He bravely keeps fighting on. Repercussions: Currently imprisoned in Bruchsal, Germany. Faces up to eight years incarceration. […] More: Revisionists: Günter Deckert

The Sham Trial of Horst Mahler Before Munich District Court II Case Number 2 KLs 11 Js 42142/07 ON 23 JANUARY 2009, IN A RAGING STORM OF PERSECUTION, HORST MAHLER CELEBRATED HIS 73RD BIRTHDAY. HE GAINS HIS INCREDIBLE STRENGTH TO DEFY THE DESTRUCTIVE MACHINERY OF THE PRESENT POLITICAL REGIME FROM HIS PRECISE UNDERSTANDING OF THE WAY THE WORLD ACTUALLY TURNS. HIS ACCOUNT NUMBER FOR THOSE WHO WISH TO SUPPORT HIM: BERLINER VOLKSBANK Account no. 5194719002 BLZ 10090000 Opening Statement Yes! I did indeed mail Germar Rudolf’s book “Lectures on the Holocaust” in digital form to three different addresses, and I also distributed the DVD “Die kurzen Beine der heiligen Lüge” to a large number of recipients. I am standing here because I choose to stand here. Do you know why I choose to do this? I respond to the question of why I am doing this with an observation by Prof. Robert Faurisson, the famous French revisionist and expert on the subject of the legends surrounding homicidal gas chambers. These legends form the very heart of the “Holocaust” cult or religion. The following quotation appeared in the newspaper La Montagne on 8 January 2009: “The Zionist-American axis has bombed German children with phosphorus, bombed the Japanese with atomic bombs, bombed Vietnamese children with Agent Orange and bombed Iraki children with depleted uranium. It is high time that the defeated, humiliated and slandered of the world strike back, and I have been doing this for many years with the ‘atomic bomb of the poor.’ That is Historical Revisionism. Revisionism is a weapon kills and disfigures no one. It destroys nothing but lies, slanders defamation, and the myth of ‘Shoa’ along with its horrible ‘Shoa Business’ that is so dear to the likes of Bernard Madoff, Elie Wiesel, all those ‘miraculously rescued’ survivors of ‘Holocaust’ and the murderers of the children of Gaza.” […] More: Radio Islam

Simon Sheppard Simon Sheppard Background: Simon Sheppard was born in 1957 in England. He runs a number of anti-Zionist websites. He has many articles on the website The Heretical Press that examines subjects that are taboo in the current political climate, such as multiracial society, Jews, Holocaust debunking, and perspectives about women (from a non-leftist biological point of view). By setting up his own company, The Heretical Press, he was able to get around the cancel culture, and even though he has been imprisoned numerous times for “thoughtcrimes”, the website is still running. Sheppard and his associate Stephen Whittle applied for political asylum in America in 2008 on the grounds they were being persecuted in the UK for exercising their right to free speech, but instead of being granted asylum, they were put into detention on arrival, and were eventually deported back to the UK. When they landed back in England, they were promptly arrested for exercising their right to free speech. Repercussions: He has been imprisoned four times for his ideology, specifically for distributing leaflets and publishing material on the Internet, whose opinions in them (including opinions on the so-called Holocaust) have been deemed “illegal”, and this writer and publisher has been subject to numerous raids by the police. More: Heretical.com: Legal Saga Summary

Simon Sheppard’s website “The Heretical Press” can be found at heretical.com

An illustrated parody of the Holocaust, “Tales of the Holohoax”, can be read here. It is accompanied by a historian’s assessment, which can be read here.

Sheppard was jailed in England for publishing these satirical cartoons that debunk the so-called Holocaust. England is one of 16 nations where people can be jailed for telling the truth about the “Holocaust”.

One of the pages in “Tales of the Holohoax” debunks the claim that fire and smoke could be seen from chimneys of supposed giant crematoria. The crematorium is built to suppress the emission of smoke from the chimney, and crematorium technology has been invented for this express purpose.

One of the cartoons in “Tales of the Holohoax” ridicules the notion that gas chambers were constructed of wooden doors and walls, which would be too leaky to make such a “chamber” functional. Gas would escape and kill people within close vicinity of the “chamber”, including any guards standing outside them.

A cartoon in “Tales of the Holohoax” shows how untrustworthy the claims of “Holocaust survivors” are. Barbers cutting the hair of prisoners right next door to a gas chamber would have meant barbers would have had to wear gas masks to avoid dying from fumes coming out of leaky gas chambers, which had to be fumigated for hours after any gas release into the chamber.

Gerard Menuhin Gerard Menuhin Gerard Menuhin was born in 1948 in Scotland. He is son of Yehudi Menuhin, who was Jewish, and regarded as one of the greatest violinists in the 20th century. Menuhin attended Eton College, and after graduation, took up the acting profession for some time and dabbled in writing. Menuhin has worked in various roles at foundations named after his father. In 2005, the cancel culture caught up with him, and he was relieved of his duties at these foundations, as he was open about his Holocaust truther stance. An avid anti-Zionist, he has written: “It remains for Jews only to imitate or destroy what they can never have or become, and to undermine the homogeneous social fabric via their political stooges, by civil-war-induced migrations and so-called anti-discriminatory legislation, including attacks on such core values as the traditional family, through contrived ‘gender neutral’ and radical feminist ideologies and ‘movements’.” Menuhin also became an admirer of Hitler and national socialism. Gerard Menuhin wrote “Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil”, a book that debunks the Holocaust myth, in 2015. According to Menuhin, the Holocaust is “the biggest lie in history” and “Germany has no blame for the Second World War”.

Gerard Menuhin’s book “Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil” is available at Holocaust Handbooks and can be read for free there.

Here is an extract from his book that explains the origins of the word “Nazi”. It originated as an insulting epithet to refer to national socialists. Despite this, this word is in widespread use today.

Before we go any further, a brief note about the word “Nazi.” “Nazi” is a political epithet invented by Jewish journalist and member of the Social Democratic Party Konrad Heiden, during the 1920s, as a means of denigrating the NSDAP and National Socialism. The term is an imitation of the nickname given to Marxists of the SDP at the time, Sozi. It was then popularized abroad by various Judaics and other subversives, including Heiden himself, who fled the country after the NSDAP were elected to government. The term was regarded as a derogatory epithet by National Socialists and was used almost exclusively by Marxist agitators. Typically, the use of “Nazi Germany” and “Nazi regime” was popularized by Jewish emigres from Germany after 1933, especially in English-speaking countries. From them, it spread into other languages. (Metapedia)

I THWARTED: HUMANITY’S LAST GRASP FOR FREEDOM This dog is a labrador. Seldom barks and is good natured, like most labradors. Now and then, I join its owner for one of his daily rounds to air the animal. He’s a Jehovah’s Witness. Initially, he did his duty by trying to convert me, but I told him that I don’t believe in anything I can’t see, so he gave up. If I needed to worship anything, it would be trees. Trees have this in common with a folk culture and a manufacturing economy: both are rooted in the ground and so are stable. A seasonal or service economy, supplying a mayfly community of consumers, is unstable. Any tree is worth countless consumers, as they rarely provide anything beneficial. What they can and often do is to destroy trees. It takes a subhuman with a chainsaw only seconds to cut down what has taken maybe hundreds of years to grow. Picture an oak. […] More: Holocaust Handbooks

David Cole David Cole Background: This young Jewish Revisionist filmmaker came to the defense of Ernst Zündel when Zündel needed defending. Subsequently, Zündel and Cole made a film in Auschwitz, with David Cole pointing out all the things wrong with that theme park of hate against Germans. Later yet, Cole came to Canada to lecture to large audiences on his Revisionist findings in Auschwitz, together with David Irving. He also appeared with Zündel in Munich, Germany, spreading Revisionism right under the watchful eyes of the German political police. In a vicious letter posted on the Internet, the Jewish Defense League threatened Cole’s life. Emotionally fragile and torn between his conscience and family loyalties as well as filial devotion, he could not withstand the pressure and recanted with an abject apology to his tribesmen and tormentors. Every serious Revisionist understands that this act of recantation was coerced and may have bought David his very survival. Repercussions: Became a victim of the JDL. Was physically beaten. Had his life threatened on the Internet by the Jewish Defense League. More: Revisionists: David Cole and A Jewish Revisionist’s Visit to Auschwitz

#davidcole

David Cole In Auschwitz

https://www.bitchute.com/video/8acyObMjqQlU/

VIDEO: Bitchute

____________________

German internment camps – a story as told by their own inmates

German Concentration Camps Theresienstadt Ghetto as painted by one of the inmates during the war. All photos and artwork in this presentation were found in the camp museums. ______________________________ The Camp Rules These rules are on display in Sachsenhausen but all camps were subject to the same rules. FREE TIME Prisoners may spend their free time in the Barracks, reading, writing, or in conversation. Gambling is forbidden. It is also forbidden to enter other people’s barracks, so is making unnecessary noise, whistling, singing or playing games. It is forbidden to enter cordoned-off areas. Prisoners may use designated areas but forming groups of more than three persons is not allowed. The Camp’s library and radios can be used for educational purposes. Party newspapers may be delivered after gaining permission from the Camp Commandant. (Notice that screaming,whining, moaning or crying was not forbidden so WHY was it necessary to forbid singing, whistling and playing games? And notice they had access to radios and a library.) Receiving Money All prisoners are allowed to receive money from their family. Received monies will be paid into the prisoner’s account. To buy in the Canteen, prisoners may withdraw up to RM 15,- per week from their account. However all purchases will be carried out cashless. It is strictly forbidden for prisoners to carry cash including foreign money, hide cash in cupboards, or horde large sums of money. (So now we know prisoners not only had access to radios and a library but they also had bank accounts as well.) CUPBOARD RULES The top board is for letters, toothbrush, razor, tobacco, etc. The lower board is for your plate and drinking glass. Behind these, you put your bread and other edibles. Spoon and knife are to be put in the board of the cupboard door. All of these are to be kept spotlessly clean. Your coat is to lay folded on the bottom, number on the top. Just before lights out, shoes are to be cleaned outside the barracks and then placed in front of the cupboard with the socks on top. It is forbidden to take socks into the sleeping area. ______________________________ Q: So, what about those skeletons we see in the media? A: Those were people who had caught diseases such as typhus, etc. Now compare them to these pictures taken by Allied photographers after the camps were captured in 1945. Above photo was taken by the Russians in Auschwitz. The two photos left and right, above, were taken by the British in Bergen-Belsen.             ____________________________________ Many Prisoners Got Married and Had Children Wedding in Auschwitz 1944: they had printed cards, photos, flowers, fashionable hairdos (not shaven), and the groom wore a suit and tie. Another wedding in Westerbork Camp in Holland, and a photo of two nurses holding babies born in KL Auschwitz.   (KL= Konzentrations Lager) ______________________________________________ What Was the Food Like ? Up until the war destroyed most of Germany’s ability to produce and deliver food to the camps, the food was quite adequate. Most camps had their own gardens as the photos below show. Some camps kept animals such as pigs for food. (Below is a sketch of KL Neuengammes pig pens) The photo below shows a prisoners meal time. This photo shows the daily food ration for prisoners in Auschwitz. Towards the end of the war, food became scarce for everyone including the German population. ________________________________________________ Swimming Pools In many camps prisoners could go swimming. Above is the pool in Auschwitz. Above is the pool in Theresienstadt. Above is the pool in the women’s camp of Ravensbrueck. _______________________________________________ Other Leisure Activities As well as swimming, the inmates could play football or watch a concert, and they even had the appropriate clothing with them. ______________________________________________ Theresienstadt Leisure Pursuits Relaxation in Theresienstadt was expressing your artistic talents … … knitting or … … just watering your garden. _______________________________________________ Brothels The prisoners (not the SS Guards) had the use of brothels. Here we show (from the top) the brothel in Mauthausen Camp, below that the brothel in Buchenwald, and below that the brothel in Dora-Mittelbau. Above: Mauthausen Camp brothel Above: Brothel in Buchenwald Above: Brothel in Dora-Mittelbau ______________________________________________ The Brothel in Neuengamme Camp Notice the well kept gardens. Foto: Courtesy Camp Museum ____________________________________________________ Brothel Permits To visit a brothel, a prisoner had to first get a permit and be checked by the camp doctor. Below is the brothel in Buchenwald with a radio on the wall, and flowers and ashtrays on the tables. ________________________________________________ Orchestra of Neuengamme There were orchestral concerts or lectures, as painted by a prisoner. ______________________________________________ What about Christmas? _________________________________________________ New Year’s Party SACHSENHAUSEN CAMP Friday 31st Dec 1943 There will be a buffet, shooting gallery, circus, ballet, dancing, acrobats, singing, and many other fun things to do. The party starts at 11pm and goes until …? ___________________________________________________ Celebrating Hannukah Jewish youth celebrating Hannukah in Westerbork Camp, and below that, a school class. _________________________________________________ Hospital and Dental Surgery Prisoners who got ill had access to a hospital and dental surgery as these photos from Auschwitz, Buchenwald, Belsen and Ravensbrueck show. __________________________________________________ Release from the Camp Prisoners were released from the camps after they had finished their time. Above is a release form from Auschwitz, and below, the camp commandant of a camp in Hamburg farewells prisoners who are being released.

______________________________

REFERENCE ARTICLES

How the British Obtained The Confessions Of Rudolf Höss By Dr. Robert Faurisson The Journal for Historical Review Winter 1986 Volume 7 page 389 11-27-5 Rudolf Höss was the first of three successive commandants of the Auschwitz concentration camp. He is often called “the Commandant of Auschwitz,” and the general public knows of him from a book published under the title Commandant in Auschwitz. He appeared before the International Military Tribunal as a witness on 15 April 1946, where his deposition caused a sensation. To the amazement of the defendants and in the presence of journalists from around the world, he confessed to the most frightful crimes that history had ever known. He said that he had personally received an order from Himmler to exterminate the Jews. He estimated that at Auschwitz 3,000,000 people had been exterminated, 2,500,000 of them by means of gas chambers. His confessions were false. They had been extorted from Höss by torture, but it took until 1983 to learn the identity of the torturers and the nature of the tortures they inflicted upon him. The confessions of Rudolf Höss supply the keystone to the theory which maintains that systematic extermination of the Jews, especially by means of homicidal gas chambers, was a historical reality. These confessions consist essentially of four documents which, in chronological order, are the following: […] The war ended in Germany on 8 May 1945. Höss fell into the hands of the British, who imprisoned him in a camp for SS men. As a trained agronomist, he obtained an early release. His guards were unaware of the importance of their prey. A work office found him employment as an agricultural work at a farm near Flensburg, not far from the Danish border. He remained there for eight months. The military police looked for him. His family, with whom he succeeded in making contact, was closely watched and subjected to frequent searches. Revelations in 1983 About the British Torturers of Rudolf Höss The Revisionists proved a long time ago that the various confessions of Rudolf Höss contained so many gross errors, nonsensical elements, and impossibilities of all kinds, that it is no longer possible to believe them, as did the judges at Nuremberg and Cracow, as well as certain self styled historians, without any prior analysis of their content and of the circumstances in which they were obtained. In all likelihood, Höss was tortured by the British soldiers of the 92nd Field Security Section, but a confirmation of that hypothesis was necessary. Confirmation has come with the publication in England of a book containing the name of the principal torturer (a British sergeant of Jewish origin) and a description of the circumstances of Höss’ arrest, as well as his third-degree interrogation. The book is by Rupert Butler. It was published in 1983 (Hamlyn Paperbacks). Butler is the author of three other works: The Black Angels, Hand of Steel and Gestapo, all published by Hamlyn. The book that interests us is entitled Legions of Death. Its inspiration is anti-Nazi. Butler says that he researched this book at the Imperial War Museum in London, the Institute for Contemporary History and Wiener Library, and other such prestigious institutions. At the beginning of his book, he expresses his gratitude to these institutions and, among others, to two persons, one of whom is Bernard Clarke (“who captured Auschwitz Commandant Rudolf Höss”). The author quotes several fragments of what are either written or recorded statements by Clarke. Bernard Clarke shows no remorse. On the contrary, he exhibits a certain pride in having tortured a “Nazi.” Rupert Butler, likewise, finds nothing to criticize in that. Neither of them understands the importance of their revelations. They say that Höss was arrested on 11 March, 1946, and that it took three days of torture to obtain “a coherent statement.” They do not realize that the alleged “coherent statement” is nothing other than the lunatic confession, signed by their quivering victim on the l4th or l5th of March 1946, at 2:30 in the morning, which was to seal Höss’ fate definitely, a confession which would also give definitive shape to the myth. The confession would also shape decisively the myth of Auschwitz, the supposed high-point of the extermination of the Jews, above all due to the alleged use of homicidal gas chambers. On 11 March 1946, a Captain Cross, Bernard Clarke and four other intelligence specialists in British uniforms, most of them tall and menacing, entered the home of Frau Höss and her children. The six men, we are told, were all “practised in the more sophisticated techniques of sustained and merciless investigation” (p. 235). Clarke began to shout: If you don’t tell us [where your husband is] we’ll turn you over to the Russians and they’ll put you before a firing-squad. Your son will go to Siberia. Frau Höss broke down and revealed, says Clarke, the location of the farm where her husband was in hiding, as well as his assumed name: Franz Lang. And Bernard Clarke added: Suitable intimidation of the son and daughter produced precisely identical information. The Jewish sergeant and the five other specialists in third degree interrogation then left to seek out Höss, whom they surprised in the middle of the night, sleeping in an alcove of the room used to slaughter cattle on the farm. Höss screamed in terror at the mere sight of British uniforms. Clarke yelled “What is your name?” With each answer of “Franz Lang,” Clarke’s hand crashed into the face of his prisoner. The fourth time that happened, Höss broke and admitted who he was. The admission suddenly unleashed the loathing of the Jewish sergeants in the arresting party whose parents had died in Auschwitz following an order signed by Höss. The prisoner was torn from the top bunk, the pyjamas ripped from his body. He was then dragged naked to one of the slaughter tables, where it seemed to Clarke the blows and screams were endless. Eventually, the Medical Officer urged the Captain: “Call them off, unless you want to take back a corpse.” A blanket was thrown over Höss and he was dragged to Clarke’s car, where the sergeant poured a substantial slug of whisky down his throat. Then Höss tried to sleep. Clarke thrust his service stick under the man’s eyelids and ordered in German: “Keep your pig eyes open, you swine.” For the first time Höss trotted out his oft-repeated justification: “I took my orders from Himmler. I am a soldier in the same way as you are a soldier and we had to obey orders.” The party arrived back at Heide around three in the morning. The snow was swirling still, but the blanket was torn from Höss and he was made to walk completely nude through the prison yard to his cell. (p. 237) So it is that Bernard reveals “It took three days to get a coherent statement out of [Höss]” (ibid.). This admission was corroborated by Mr. Ken Jones in an article in the Wrexham Leader. (October 17,1986): Mr. Ken Jones was then a private with the fifth Royal Horse Artillery stationed at Heid[e) in Schleswig-Holstein. “They brought him to us when he refused to cooperate over questioning about his activities during the war. He came in the winter of 1945/6 and was put in a small jail cell in the barracks,” recalls Mr. Jones. Two other soldiers were detailed with Mr. Jones to join Höss in his cell to help break him down for interrogation. “We sat in the cell with him, night and day, armed with axe handles. Our job was to prod him every time he fell asleep to help break down his resistance,” said Mr. Jones. When Höss was taken out for exercise he was made to wear only jeans and a thin cotton shirt in the bitter cold. After three days and nights without sleep, Höss finally broke down and made a full confession to the authorities. Clarke’s statement, obtained under the conditions just described by bullies of British Military Security under the brutal inspiration of sergeant-interpreter Bernard Clarke, became Höss’s first confession, the original confession indexed under the number NO-1210. Once the tortured prisoner had begun to talk, according to Clarke, it was impossible to stop him. Clarke, no more conscious in 1982 or 1983 than in 1946 of the enormity of what he forced Höss to confess, goes on to describe a series of fictitious horrors presented here as the truth: Höss went on to tell how after the bodies had been ignited, the fat oozing from them was poured over the other bodies (!). He estimated the number of dead during just the period when he was at Auschwitz at two million (!); the killings reached 10,000 victims per day (!). It was Clarke’s duty to censor the letters sent by Höss to his wife and children. Every policeman knows that the power to grant or withhold permission to a prisoner to write to his family constitutes a psychological weapon. To make a prisoner “sing” it is sometimes sufficient to merely suspend or cancel that authorization. Clarke makes an interesting remark about the content of Höss’s letters; he confides to us: Sometimes a lump came to my throat. There were two different men in that one man. One was brutal with no regard for human life. The other was soft and affectionate. (p. 238) Rupert Butler ends his narrative by saying that Höss sought neither to deny nor to escape his responsibilities. In effect, at the Nuremberg tribunal Höss conducted himself with a “schizoid apathy.” The expression is that of the American prison psychologist, G.M. Gilbert, who was in charge of the psychological surveillance of the prisoners and whose eavesdropping aided the American prosecution. We can certainly believe that Höss was “split in two”! He had the appearance of a rag because they had turned him into a rag. “Apathetic”, writes Gilbert on page 229 of his book; “apathetic, he repeats on the following page; “schizoid apathy,” he writes on page 239 (Nuremberg Diary, 1947, Signet Book, 1961). At the end of his trial at Cracow; Höss greeted his death sentence with apparent indifference, Rupert Butler comments as follows: [Höss] reasoned that Allies had their orders and, that there could be absolutely no question of these not being carried out. (ibid.) One could not say it any better. It seems that Rudolf Höss, like thousands of accused Germans turned over to the mercy of conquerors who were totally convinced of their own goodness, had quickly grasped that he had no other choice but to suffer the will of his judges, whether they came from the West or from the East. Butler then quickly evokes the case of Hans Frank, the former Governor of Poland. With the same tone of moral satisfaction he recounts the circumstances of Frank’s capture and subsequent treatment: Celebrity status of any kind singularly failed to impress the two coloured GIs who arrested him and made sure he was transported to the municipal prison in Miesbach only after he had been savagely beaten up and flung into a lorry. A tarpaulin had been thrown over him to hide the more obvious signs of ill-treatment; Frank found the cover useful when he attempted to slash an artery in his left arm. Clearly, no such easy way out could be permitted; a US army medical officer saved his life and he stood trial at the International Military Tribunial at Nuremberg. (p. 238-239) Rudolf Höss and Hans Frank were not the only ones to undergo treatment of that kind. Among the most celebrated cases, we know of Julius Streicher, Hans Fritzsche, Oswald Pohl, Franz Ziereis, and Josef Kramer. But the case of Rudolf Höss is by far the most serious in its consequences. There is no document that proves that the Germans had a policy of exterminating the Jews. Léon Poliakov agreed with this in 1951: As regards the conception properly called of the plan for a total extermination, the three or four principal actors committed suicide in May of 1945. No document has survived or perhaps has ever existed. (Bréviaire de la haine: Le IIIe Reich et les Juifs, Calmann-Levy, 1951, Livre de Poche, 1974, p.171 ) In the absence of any document, historians à la Poliakov have repeatedly returned, primarily, to doubtful confessions like those of Kurt Gerstein or Rudolf Höss, sometimes modifying the texts to suit their convenience. Bernard Clarke is “today a successful businessman working in the south of England” (Legions of Death, 1983, p. 235). One can in fact say that it is his voice that was heard at Nuremberg on 15 April 1946, when Assistant Prosecutor Amen read, piece by piece, to an astonished and overwhelmed audience, the supposed confession of Rudolf Höss. On that day was launched a lie of world-wide dimensions: the lie of Auschwitz. At the origins of that prodigious media event: several Jewish sergeants of British Military Security, including Bernard Clarke, “today a successful businessman working in the south of England.” The Testimony of Moritz von Schirmeister During the war, Moritz von Schirmeister had been the personal press attaché of Joseph Goebbels. On 29 June 1946, he was interrogated before the IMT as a defense witness for Hans Fritzsche. His deposition was particularly interesting regarding the actual personality of Dr. Goebbels and the attitude of the official German news services toward the flood of atrocity stories about the concentration camps spread during the war by the Allies. At the end of the war, Moritz von Schirmeister had been arrested by the British and interned in a camp in England, where he was given the task of politically “re-educating” his fellow prisoners. Before testifying at Nuremberg, he was transferred by plane from London to Germany. At first he was kept at Minden-on-the-Weser, which was the principal interrogation center for the British Military Police. From there he was taken by car (31 March — 1 April 1946) to the prison at Nuremberg. In the same car rode Rudolf Höss. Moritz von Schirmeister is precisely that “prisoner of war who had been brought over from London as a witness in Fritzsche’s defense about whom Höss speaks in his “memoirs” (see above, p. 393). Thanks to a document that I obtained from American researcher Mark Weber, who gave me a copy of it in Washington in September of 1983 (a document whose exact source I not yet authorized to indicate), we know that they were able to talk freely in the car that took them to Nuremberg. In that document, slightly more than two pages long, Schirmeister reports, as regarding the charges hanging over Höss, that Höss confided to him: Gewiss, ich habe unterschrieben, dass ich 2 Millionen Juden umgebracht habe. Aber ich hätte genausogut untershrieben, dass es 5 Millionen Juden gewesen sind. Es gibt eben Methoden, mit denen man jedes Geständnis erreichen kann — ob es nun wahr ist oder nicht.” Certainly, I signed a statement that I killed two and a half million Jews. But I could just as well have said that it was five million Jews. There are certain methods by which any confession can be obtained, whether it is true or not.” Another Confession Signed by Rudolf Höss The British torturers of Rudolf Höss had no reason to exercise any restraint. After making him sign document NO-1210 at 2:30 in the morning of the l4th or l5th of March 1946, they obtained a new signature from him on March 16, this time at the bottom of a text in English, written in an English handwriting style, with a blank in the space where the name of the place ought to have been given. His guards made him sign a simple note written in English: Statement made voluntarily at ______ Gaol by Rudolf Höss, former Commandant of Auschwitz Concentration Camp on l6th day of March 1946. I personally arranged on orders received from Himmler in May 1941 the gassing of two million persons between June/July 1941 and the end of 1943 during which time I was commandant of Auschwitz. signed. Rudolf Höss, SS-Stubhr. Eh. (?) Kdt. v. Auschwitz-Birkenau (even the word “signed” was written in an English hand). The Auschwitz Myth We have known for some time that the Auschwitz myth is of an exclusively Jewish origin. Arthur R. Butz has related the facts in his book, The Hoax of the Twentieth Century, as has Wilhelm Stäglich in The Auschwitz Myth. The principal authors of the creation and the peddling of the “rumor of Auschwitz” have been, successively, two Slovaks, Alfred Wetzler (or Weczler) and Rudolf Vrba (or Rosenberg or Rosenthal); then a Hungarian, Rabbi Michael Dov Ber Weissmandel (or Weissmandl); then, in Switzerland, representatives of the World Jewish Congress like Gerhard Riegner, who were in touch with London and Washington; and finally Americans like Harry Dexter White, Henry Morgenthau Jr. and Rabbi Stephen Samuel Wise. Thus was born the famous World Refugee Board Report on Auschwitz and Birkenau, published in Washington in November 1944. Copies of this report were included in the files of the judges advocate general in charge of prosecuting the Germans involved in the Auschwitz camp. It constituted the official version of the story of the alleged gassing of the Jews in that camp. Most probably it was used as a reference work by the inquirers-interrogators-torturers of “the Commandant of Auschwitz.” All the names here mentioned are those of Jews. Moreover we now see that Bernard Clarke, the first British torturer, was a Jew, The second British torturer, Major Draper (?), may also have been a Jew. The same for the two Americans: psychologist G.M. (Gustave Mahler) Gilbert and Colonel Harlan Amen. Finally, in Poland, Höss was faced with Polish Jews who treated him more or less the same way. When he wrote his “memoirs” it was under the supervision of instructing magistrate Jan Sehn, who was also probably a Jew. Establishment historians dispute that Höss had been tortured and had confessed under duress. Since the publication of Rupert Butler’s book in 1983, however, it is no longer possible for them to contest that. The Revisionists were right. Since 1985 it is even less possible. In January-March 1985, the trial of Ernst Zündel, who was accused by a Jewish association and by the Crown of spreading Revisionist literature, took place in Toronto (Canada). Rudolf Vrba testified as a Crown witness. (He lives now in British Columbia). Affirmative and self assured as long as he answered the questions of the Crown, he suffered a spectacular rout when cross-examined by Ernst Zündel’s lawyer, Doug Christie. For the first time since 1945 a Jewish witness to the alleged gassings in Auschwitz was asked to explain his affirmations and his figures. The result was so terrible for R. Vrba that finally the Crown itself gave a kind of coup de grace to its key witness. That unexpected event and some others (like the leading specialist of the Holocaust, Raul Hilberg, being caught red-handed in his lies) really made of the “Toronto Trial” the “Trial of the Nuremberg Trial.” The unintentional revelations of Rupert Butler in 1983 and unexpected revelations of the “Toronto Trial” in 1985 succeeded at last in showing entirely and clearly how the Auschwitz myth was fabricated from 1944 to 1947, to be exact from April 1944, when Rudolf Vrba and Alfred Wetzler are supposed to have escaped from Auschwitz to tell their story to the world up until April 1947, when Rudolf Höss was hanged after having supposedly told the same world his own story about Auschwitz. It is remarkable that from beginning to end that story comes from essentially or perhaps even exclusively Jewish sources. Two Jewish liars (Vrba and Wetzler) from Slovakia convinced or seemed to have convinced other Jews from Hungary, Switzerland, United States, Great Britain, and Poland. This is not a conspiracy or a plot; it is the story of the birth of a religious belief: the myth of Auschwitz, center of the religion of the Holocaust. The Journal for Historical Review Winter 1986 Volume 7 page 389 Rense

________________________________

International Red Cross Report Exposes the Hoax

By Michael McGrath |
LINK

INTERNATIONAL RED CROSS (IRC) DOCUMENT CONFIRMS 271 THOUSAND – NOT 6 MILLION – DIED IN CONCENTRATION CAMPS OFFICIAL INTERNATIONAL RED CROSS RECORDS RELEASED Sealed and guarded since the end of WWII at Arolsen, Germany, the Official IRC records reveal the actual Concentration Camp total death toll was 271,301. For years, people around the world – “the West” in particular – have been told that “six million Jews were systematically murdered by Germans in ‘Concentration Camps’ during World War 2.” […] The International Red Cross published their analysis in a three volume “Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War” published in Geneva in 1948. This analysis expanded findings of two previous publications: “Sur L’activite du CICR en faveur des civils detencus dans les camps de concentration en Allemagne 1939-1945″ (Geneva, 1946) and “Inter Arma Caritas: The Work of the ICRF during the Second World War” (Geneva, 1947). In 1949, the International Red Cross interviewed prisoners in the German camps. They were not allowed to interview prisoners in the Russian camps, which were far more harsh. The German camps held both political prisoners (Schutzhaflinge) and those convicted of crimes. The Germans allowed the Red Cross to distribute food, medicine and clothing to the prisoners. Grateful prisoners sent letters of thanks from Dachau, Buchenwalk, Sangerhausen, Sachsenhausen, Oranienburg, Flossenburg, Landsberg-am-Lech, Fibha, Ravensbruck, Hamburg-Neuengamme, Mauthausen, Theresienstadt, Auschwitz, Bergen-Belsen and others. “The principal recipients [of Red Cross goods] were Belgians, Dutch, French, Greeks, Italians, Norwegians, Poles and stateless Jews” (Vol. III, p. 83). Regarding Theresienstadt, the Red Cross said, “[Theresienstadt], where there were about 40,000 Jews deported from various countries, was a relatively privileged ghetto” (Vol. III, p. 75). “The Committee’s delegates were able to visit the camp at Theresienstadt (Terezin) which was used exclusively for Jews and was governed by special conditions … From information gathered by the Commmittee, this camp had been started as an experiment by certain leaders of the Reich … These men wished to give the Jews the means of setting up a communal life in a town under their own administration and possessing almost complete autonomy … two delegates were able to visit the camp on April 6, 1945. They confirmed the favourable impression gained on the first visit” (Vol. I, p. 642). The ICRC also had praise for the regime of Ion Antonescu of Fascist Rumania, where the Committee was able to extend special relief to 183,000 Rumanian Jews until the time of the Soviet occupation. The aid then ceased and the ICRC complained bitterly that it never succeeded “in sending anything whatsoever to Russia” (Vol. II, p. 62). The same situation applied to many of the German camps after their “liberation” by the Russians. The ICRC received a voluminous flow of mail from Auschwitz until the period of the Soviet occupation, when many of the internees were evacuated westward. But the efforts of the Red Cross to send relief to internees remaining at Auschwitz under Soviet control were futile. However, food parcels continued to be sent to former Auschwitz inmates transferred west to such camps as Buchenwald and Oranienburg. NO MENTION OF GAS CHAMBERS One of the most important aspects of the Report of the ICRC is that it clarifies the true cause of those deaths that undoubtedly occurred in the camps towards the end of the war. Says the Report: “in the chaotic condition of Germany after the invasion during the final months of the war, the camps received no food supplies at all and starvation claimed an increasing number of victims. Itself alarmed by this situation, the German Government at last informed the ICRC on February 1, 1945 … In March 1945, discussions between the President of the ICRC and General of the S.S. Kaltenbrunner gave even more decisive results. Relief could henceforth be distributed by the ICRC and one delegate was authorised to stay in each camp .I.” (Vol. III, p.83). Clearly, the German authorities were at pains to relieve the dire situation as far as they were able. The Red Cross are quite explicit in stating that food supplies ceased at this time due to the Allied bombing of German transportation, and in the interests of interned Jews, they had protested on March 15, 1944 against “the barbarous aerial warfare of the Allies” (Inter Armet Caritns, p. 78). By October 2, 1944, the ICRC had warned the German Foreign Office of the impending collapse of the German transportation system, declaring that starvation conditions for people throughout Germany were becoming inevitable. In dealing with this comprehensive, three-volume Report, it is important to stress that the delegates of the International Red Cross found no evidence whatsoever of ‘gas chambers’. The original 1946 edition did not even talk of ‘extermination’ or ‘death camps’ but after the emotional impact of the Nuremberg trials, the Red Cross felt compelled to introduce into the expanded 1948 Report several, very cursory references to ‘death camps’ (Vol. 1 p. 641) and ‘extermination camps’ (Vol. I p. 645). However, no means of ‘extermination’ is indicated. In all its 1,600 pages, the three-volume Report does not even mention such a thing as a ‘gas chamber’. It acknowledges that Jews, like many other wartime nationalities, suffered rigours and privations, but its complete silence on the subject of ‘gassings’ is ample refutation of the ‘Holocaust’ legend. NOT ALL WERE INTERNED Volume III of the Report of the ICRC, Chapter 3 (I. Jewish Civilian Population) deals with the “aid given to the Jewish section of the free population” and this chapter makes it quite plain that by no means all of the European Jews were placed in internment camps but remained, subject to certain restrictions, as part of the free civilian population. This conflicts directly with the “thoroughness” of the supposed “extermination programme”, and with the claim in the forged Hoess memoirs that Eichmann was obsessed with seizing every single Jew he could lay his hands on”. In Slovakia, for example, where Eichmann’s assistant Dieter Wisliceny was in charge, the Report states that “A large proportion of the Jewish minority had permission to stay in the country, and at certain periods, Slovakia was looked upon as a comparative haven of refuge for Jews, especially for those coming from Poland. Those who remained in Slovakia seem to have been in comparative safety until the end of August 1944, when a rising against the German forces took place. While it is true that the law of May 15, 1942 had brought about the internment of several thousand Jews, these people were held in camps where the conditions of food and lodging were tolerable, and where the internees were allowed to do paid work on terms almost equal to those of the free labour market” (Vol. I, p. 646). Not only did large numbers of the three million or so European Jews avoid internment altogether, but the emigration of Jews continued throughout the war, generally by way of Hungary, Rumania and Turkey. Ironically, post-war Jewish emigration from German-occupied territories was also facilitated by the Reich, as in the case of the Polish Jews who had escaped to France before its occupation. “The Jews from Poland who, whilst in France, had obtained entrance permits to the United States, were held to be American citizens by the German occupying authorities, who further agreed to recognise the validity of about three thousand passports issued to Jews by the consulates of South American countries” (Vol. 1, p. 645). As future U.S. citizens, these Jews were held at the Vittel camp in southern France for American aliens. The emigration of European Jews from Hungary in particular proceeded during the war, unhindered by the German authorities. “Until March 1944,” says the Red Cross Report, “Jews who had the privilege of visas for Palestine were free to leave Hungary” (Vol. 1, p. 648). Even after the replacement of the Horthy Government in 1944 (following its attempted armistice with the Soviet Union) with a government more dependent on German authority, the emigration of Jews continued. The Committee secured the pledges of both Britain and the United States “to give support by every means to the emigration of Jews from Hungary,” and from the U.S. Government, the ICRC received a message stating that “The Government of the United States … now specifically repeats its assurance that arrangements will be made by it for the care of all Jews who in the present circumstances are allowed to leave” (Vol. 1, p. 649). Read more here

____________________________

Pohl Report

There are two Nuremberg documents that give total concentration camp deaths in the later half of 1942.

One is the so-called Pohl Report, 1469-PS

Fulltext: TRANSLATION OF DOCUMENT 1469-PS

Link

Pohl Report PROSECUTION EXHIBIT 165 REPORT BY POHL TO HIMMLER, 9/30/1943, ON DEATHS IN THE CONCENTRATION CAMPS, AND HIMMLER’S ANSWER, 10/8/1943 Berlin, 9/30/1943 Lichterfelde-West Unter den Eichen 126-135 Telephone: Local 765261 Long distance 765101 The Chief SS Economic and Administrative Main Office Reich Leader SS Subject: Deaths in concentration camps. Reference: None Enclosures: 3 Reich Leader: Although in the month of December the mortality rate was still approximately 10 percent, in January 1943 it fell to 8 percent and continued to fall. This reduction in the mortality rate is due primarily to the fact that the hygienic measures which have long been demanded have now been carried out, at least to a larger extent. Furthermore, it has been ordered in the field of nutrition that one-third of the food, raw and properly chopped, be added shortly before distribution, to the cooked food. Cooking too long has been avoided. Supplementary rations of sauerkraut and similar foods have been issued. In regard to clothing, it has been ordered that the prisoners may keep their coats on in the winter, insofar as their work permits. Unnecessary prolongation of roll calls has also been avoided. Permitting prisoners to receive food shipments individually has had a favorable effect. The experiments with the distribution of yeast preparation were also favorable. The above measures were aided by the fact that selected prisoners were incorporated in a special cooking course in the training kitchen at Dachau. It is intended to conduct a new cooking course in the near future. Two tables [charts] are enclosed. 1. Comparison of deaths in the second half of 1942 with the first half of 1943 this comparison shows that the over-all average of the second half of 1942 was 9.89 percent while the over-all average of the first half of 1943 was only 5.72 percent. 2. Deaths in the month of August 1943 since January 1943 the death rate has fallen steadily, so that in the month of August it was only 2.09 percent. A graph is also enclosed, illustrating the figures for the Sachsenhausen concentration camp extremely well. Sachsenhausen contains 26,500 people, 194 cases of death or 0.73 percent. Similar graphs could be obtained for all the camps. Although when bad weather begins, an increase in the death rate must be expected, it is nevertheless certain that it will no longer exceed five or six percent. In Stutthof also, the death rate for the month of August 1943 fell to 3.45 percent while in the previous month it was still 5.69 percent. Only in the Lublin concentration camp did the percentage figures rise again to two or three percent. It is to be expected that when the planned hygienic measures are carried out the mortality figures here will also no longer differ from those elsewhere. [Signed] POHL SS Obergruppenfuehrer received 10/4/1943 SS Economic and administrative Main Office Office D/III Comparison of death cases in the concentration camps, second half of 1942 and first half of 1943 July; Average number of inmates: 98,000; Death Cases: 8,329; Percent: 8.5%. August; Average number of inmates: 115,000; Death Cases: 12,217; Percentage: 10.62%. September; Average number of inmates: 110,000; Death Cases: 11,206; Percentage 10.19%. October; Average number of inmates: 85,800; Death Cases: 8,856; Percentage: 10.32%. November; Average number of inmates: 83,500; Death Cases: 8,095; Percentage: 9/69%. December; Average number of inmates: 88,000; Death Cases: 8,800; Percentage 10%. January; Average number of inmates: 123,000; Death Cases: 9,839; Percentage: 8%. February; Average number of inmates: 143,100; Death Cases: 11,650; Percentage: 8.14%. March; Average number of inmates: 154,200; Death Cases: 12,112; Percentage: 7.85%. April; Average number of inmates: 171,000; Death Cases: 8,358; Percentage: 4.71%. May; Average number of inmates: 203,000; Death Cases: 5,700; Percentage: 2.8%. June; Average number of inmates: 199,500; Death Cases: 5,650; Percentage: 2.83%. Over-all average 96,770, or 9.89 percent. Over-all average 165,600, or 5.72 percent. Oranienburg, 9/22/1943. Field Command Post, 10/8/1943 Read more: Axis History: Pohl Report

(Part I of “Debunking the Holocaust” is here.)

_________________________________________________________

Judea declares war on Germany Jews of All The World Unite in Action BOYCOTT OF GERMAN GOODS MASS DEMONSTRATIONS IN MANY DISTRICTS DRAMATIC ACTION “Daily Express” Special Political Correspondent. 24 March, 1933 ALL Israel is uniting in wrath against the Nazi onslaught on the Jews in Germany. Adolf Hitler, swept into power by an appeal to elemental patriotism, is making history of a kind he least expected. Thinking to unite only the German nation to race consciousness he has roused the whole Jewish people to a national renaissance. The appearance of the Swastika symbol of a new Germany has called forth the Lion of Judah, the old battle symbol of Jewish defiance. Fourteen million Jews dispersed throughout the world have banded together as one man to declare war on the German persecutors of their co-religionists. Sectional differences and antagonisms have been submerged in one common aim – to stand by the 600,000 Jews of Germany who are terrorised by Hitlerist anti-Semitism, and to compel Fascist Germany to end its campaign of violence and suppression directed against its Jewish minority. World Jewry has made up its mind not to rest quiescent in face of this revival of medieval Jew-baiting. Germany may be called on to pay a heavy price for Hitler’s antagonism to the Jews. She is faced with an International boycott in commerce, finance, and ministry. She may find herself in spiritual and cultural isolation, recoiling before the burning crusade that Jews of all lands are launching in defence of their afflicted brethren. The Jewish merchant prince is leaving his counting-house, the banker his board-room, the shopkeeper his store, and the pedlar his humble barrow a holy war to combat the Hitlerist enemies of the Jew. CONCERTED ACTION Plans for concerted Jewish action are being matured in Europe and America to strike back in reprisal at Hitlerist Germany. In London, New York, Paris, and Warsaw, Jewish merchants are uniting for a commercial crusade against Germany Resolutions are being taken throughout the Jewish business world to sever trade relations with Germany. Large numbers of merchants in London have resolved to stop buying German goods, even at the cost of suffering heavy loss. Similar action is being taken throughout the United States. Mass meetings in New York and other American cities attended by hundreds of thousands of indignant Jews, have called for a wholesale boycott of German goods. In Poland the trade embargo on Germany is already in operation. In France a proposed ban on German imports is being widely canvassed in Jewish circles. A concerted world boycott by Jewish buyers is likely to involve grave damage to the German export trade. Jewish merchants all over the world are large buyers of German manufactured goods, chiefly cotton goods, silks, toys, electrical fittings, and furniture. A meeting of the Jewish textile trade in London has been called for Monday to consider the situation and to determine what steps should be taken in regard to Germany. SHIPPING THREAT Germany is a heavy borrower in foreign money markets, where Jewish effluence is considerable. Continued anti-Semitism in Germany is likely to react seriously against her. A move is on foot on the part of Jewish financiers action to stop. Germany’s Transatlantic shipping traffic is likewise threatened. The Bremen and the Europa, the German crack liners, may suffer heavily from a Jewish anti-German boycott. Jewish trans-ocean travellers from an important part of the patrons of these liners because of their extensive part in international trade. The loss of their patronage would be a heavy blow to Germany’s Atlantic trade. World-wide preparations are being made to organise great Jewish demonstrations of protest to call attention to the sufferings of the German Jews at the hands of the Hitlerites, and to demand action to stop German anti-Semitism. The whole of American Jewry has been roused to an unprecedented heat of indignation agents Germany. A rabbinical decree in New York has made next Monday a day of fasting and prayer over the Hitler campaign. Fasting will begin on Sunday at sunset and finish at sunset on Monday. All Jewish shops in New York will be closed on Monday during a parade. Apart from a monster meeting in Madison Square Garden, meetings are to be held in 300 American cities. Madison Square Garden will see the remarkable sight of Bishop Manning peaking from a Jewish platform appealing for an end of the Hitler “terror”. Every Rabbi in the City of New York has been placed under a scared obligation by Rabbinical decree to devote Saturday’s sermon to the plight of the Jews in Germany. The “New York Times” this morning says a list of a thousand German immigrations who have come to the United States during recent years has been compiled by an overseas Nazi organisation, the object being to use these people for Nazi propaganda in the United States. SPECIAL SESSION The organisation of Jewish youth in Britain is organising demonstrations in London and the provinces during the week-end. The Board of Deputies of British Jews, representing the entire Jewish community in Great Britain, is meeting in special session on Sunday to discuss the German situation and decide on what action is to be taken to counteract the attacks on their German fellow Jews. Members of the American House of Representatives are introduction resolutions protesting against the anti-Jewish express in Germany. The American trade unions, representing 3,000,000 workers, have also decided to join in the protests. Representative Jewish organisations in the European capitals are understood in to be making representations to their respective Governments to use influence with the Hitler Cabinet to induce it to call a halt in the oppression of the German Jews. The old and reunited people of Israel are rising with new and modern weapons to fight this age old battle with their persecutors. Radio Islam

(Part I of “Debunking the Holocaust” is here.)

________________________________________

Friday, September 16, 2016 Sixty Reasons Six Million Did Not Die Source: http://www.takeourworldback.com/sixty-reasons.htm Here are a few of the reasons why most grown-ups know the so-called “Holocaust” is an outrageous hoax, a colossal fraud and a malicious libel that defames the memory of those who really did die. We’ll examine some of these facts in detail below. More people died on the back seat of Ted Kennedy’s car at Chappaquiddick than in any “gas chambers” throughout WWII. ___________________ (1) Insufficient time to cremate more than 400,000 bodies at Auschwitz-Birkenau, when Hoaxers claim more than a million were murdered there (after abandoning their claim of “four million” in the 1990s!). (2) Insufficient fuel to cremate more than 100,000 bodies at Auschwitz-Birkenau, when Hoaxers allege more than a million were murdered there. (3) Insufficient firebrick durability to cremate more than 108,000 bodies at Auschwitz-Birkenau, when Hoaxers contend more than a million were murdered there. (4) Hoaxer claims about improving cremator performance by stuffing multiple bodies into each muffle are refuted by the performance of modern animal cremators and incinerators. (5) Auschwitz death books record only 68,864 dead, of whom 29,125 were Jews and 31,814 were Roman Catholics. (6) Auschwitz death books included the young and old who were supposedly routinely gassed upon arrival, thereby demolishing Hoaxer claims that the books were faked by excluding “gassings” as part of a “cover-up” “conspiracy”. (7) Forensic tests conducted on the walls of the alleged “gas chambers” found zero or trace levels of stable cyanide compounds that averaged less than one-thousandth of the corresponding levels for the delousing chambers that were used to save human lives by exterminating typhus-bearing lice. (8) Hoaxers were so worried about the forensic evidence refuting their allegations that the Polish government commissioned a pseudo-scientific ‘study’ that manipulated its methodology so as to detect only unstable cyanide compounds, in a politically motivated bid to fix its result so that cyanide levels for delousing chambers were nearly down to those of the alleged “gas chambers”. (9) The absurdity of mass murder conducted by having to drag out 2,000 cyanide-contaminated corpses from an underground “gas chamber”, load them onto a 300 kg payload goods elevator that could take only five at a time (say loading, unloading and returning the elevator takes just 4 minutes; then 4 x 2,000 / (5 x 60) = 26.7 hours), and having the 2,000 piled up outside or in the oven room without raising suspicions of the next batch who think they are going to take a shower. (10) Hoaxers’ attempt to rationalize the lack of cyanide in “gas chambers” by citing hosing of walls backfires on them, since “witness” Tauber said only the floors were washed, Nyszili said the bodies were washed, and Bennahmias said the walls were whitewashed with a quick-drying paint after each “gassing”. If the first two were telling the truth, the increased humidity would be more conducive to Iron Blue formation. If the walls were whitewashed after each “gassing”, the HCN would be locked inside after having penetrated the wall, and cyanide compounds would be found across the interior as in the delousing chambers, yet they are not. Even if the witnesses lied and the walls were hosed, the HCN would have penetrated inside and evidence of it would be apparent. (11) Hoaxers’ attempt to rationalize the lack of cyanide in “gas chambers” by claiming it takes much more HCN to kill insects than humans backfires on them, by the sheer absurdity of the “Nazis” using 99.9% of their Zyklon B to save their prisoners’ lives whilst using the remaining 0.1% to murder them (or actually 99.99% and 0.01%, after allowing for the cool, moist, cement / concrete walls of the alleged “gas chambers” being more conducive to formation of Iron Blue). (12) Topsoil at Treblinka was not disturbed in any extent commensurate with 870,000 corpses buried and exhumed. (13) It would have taken until September 1994 for the 25 woodcutters at Treblinka to chop, saw and gather sufficient wood to cremate 870,000 bodies, or alternatively, they would need to be capable of attaining a productivity rate 88 times higher than well-fed and well-equipped Italian woodcutters in peacetime. (14) The impossibility and absurdity of murdering nearly two million Jews by up to 32 minutes of exposure to diesel exhaust with more than 10% oxygen and up to 0.2% CO. (15) The absurdity of building “death camps” such as Treblinka without any purpose-built crematoria. (16) The absurdity of a “death camp” such as Auschwitz having a hospital, where Anne Frank was treated for scabies, and the contradiction of routine “gassings” for the sick at Auschwitz whilst Frank was sent to Bergen-Belsen, where she died – not at the hands of any fiendish “Nazis”, but from typhus. (17) The gas bottle at Majdanek with the inscription “1 kg CO2” that was claimed as carbon monoxide – or even “carbon oxide” (!) – by the storytellers. (18) The absurdity of Himmler becoming so worried in late February or early March of 1943 that the Allies might discover millions of alleged buried corpses in Russia and Poland, including nearly 900,000 Jews at Treblinka, that he panicked and issued an order to exhume and cremate all the bodies as part of a massive cover-up, with the same Heinrich Himmler going on to talk openly about exterminating the Jews in a “secret” speech – and having it recorded so that it could be used as evidence against him (!) – at Posen later that year, on 4 October, 1943. (19) The impossibility of 2,955 Einsatzgruppen – including the clerks – identifying and selecting 2 to 3 million Jews in a war zone out of an enemy population of tens of millions (by using callipers to measure their noses, or asking to see if they were circumcised?), shooting all those Jews without being killed themselves, and then eliminating millions of corpses without Allied aircrew seeing the flames and smoke from open-air cremations. (20) The contradictory juxtaposition of ‘honest’ witnesses with so many ‘witnesses’ who are proven liars, e.g., it was “real in their mind”, they repeatedly swallowed and defecated diamonds for two years, they were “raised by wolves”, skin turned “blue” when Jews supposedly died from CO or cyanide poisoning, etc.. (21) The non-mention of “gassings” in encrypted communications and private diaries. (22) The lack of any “Hitler order”, or any budget, blueprint or central office for an “extermination” program. (23) The impossibility of communicating a system of “code words” and “euphemisms” by telepathy or semaphore for “covering up” genocide that could be followed religiously, without a single blunder. (24) The improbability that no German would take a photograph of a “gas chamber”, and the impossibility of communicating an order not to do so by telepathy or semaphore. (25) The improbability that the Germans would be able to instantly cremate all “gassed” victims whilst leaving victims of natural deaths piled up outside, so that Allied doctors conducting autopsies would never find evidence of death by poison gas, and the impossibility of ordering such a “cover-up” by telepathy or semaphore. (26) The absurdity of the claim by Charles Bendel, a Jewish “medical doctor”, that “German methods” would allow 1,000 people to fit into a “gas chamber” of 10 m x 4 m x 1.6 m = 64 cubic meters = 64 liters per person, which is a packing density of 55 / 64 = 0.859 if the average person weighed only 55 kg and had a density equal to that of water. (27) The attempt to mislead by producing a fraudulent documentary in which a young redhead goes to Treblinka and becomes tearful, after pretending to think a cemetery with forty bone fragments is a mass grave and a pierced mullet star brand mark of a porcelain factory is a “Star of David”. (28) The requirement for the Soviets to construct a “gas chamber” at Auschwitz I after the war, in order to sell the legend to unsuspecting tourists. (29) Lies about “death camps” in Germany proper, and the requirement to fall back on the claim that the “death camps” ‘coincidentally’ just happened to be situated behind the Iron Curtain, where Stalin and Beria had control of who was allowed to look at the ‘evidence’. (30) After the claim of a “gas chamber” at Dachau was shown to be a lie, the attempted cover-up by pretending that the Germans had been attempting to build the “gas chamber” for three years, but never completed the project even though “work was going on at a high speed“. (31) The impossibility of utilizing mortuary 1 of Krema II (allegedly responsible for most of the Auschwitz-Birkenau “gassings”) as a “gas chamber”, when there were no input holes in the ceiling for the introduction of Zyklon B at the time that the “gassings” were supposedly taking place. (32) The absurdity of building a “gas chamber” for mass murder with flimsy wooden doors that opened to the inside, where bodies would be piled up. (33) The absurdity of converting an underground morgue into a “gas chamber” by chiseling out square holes for the introduction of Zyklon B granules. (34) Lies about mass murder by quicklime / vacuum chambers / steam chambers / a “building where the floor was electrified in a special way” / pedal-operated brain-bashing machines / masturbation machines / atomic devices for vaporizing 20,000 Jews / Jew-eating bear and Jew-pecking eagle / being made to climb trees that would be chopped down / being pushed off cliffs, etc.. (35) Lies about Jews being made into soap, knife cases, light switches, lampshades, shrunken heads, saddles, riding breeches, gloves, house slippers, ladies’ handbags, and book-binders. (36) Lies about flames shooting out of the crematory chimneys. (37) The requirement for Hoaxers such as Raul Hilberg to spend a lifetime trawling through documents in the hope of finding something that could be deliberately misinterpreted as ‘evidence’ for extermination, and then not being able to come up with anything more incriminating than verbs such as “ausrotten”. (38) Hitler’s remark of November 10, 1938, about needing to “annihilate” the class of German intellectuals, Himmler’s statement (as quoted by his masseur, Felix Kersten, in a diary entry dated December 12, 1940) that Hitler wanted to “wipe out the Jews”, and Himmler’s statement of April 18, 1941 (according to Kersten) that “The Jews must be annihilated by the end of the war” – before Hoaxers contend any decision had been made to “exterminate” the Jews. (39) The requirement to have dozens of “Holocaust museums” around the world to sell the story. (40) There’s no business like Shoah business. (41) Lying about “six million” dead, fictitious “gas chambers” and about most or all Jews being of Semitic origin – when nearly all are from the Caucasus as proved by Elhaik (2012) – is a price worth paying for being handed your own sovereign state and 8,000 square miles of land, when your religion tells you that you are “God’s Chosen People” and its Talmudist ‘ethics’ encourages lying, cheating, thieving, raping and killing, provided the “goyim” (non-Jews) are the victims. Christians – or even atheists brought up in a Christian White European culture – are particularly susceptible to falling for the Hoax, since their ethics is the polar opposite of the Talmudists. They find it hard to believe that “witnesses” would lie about an event of such importance, and so they tend to take the “witnesses” at face value and to ignore the material facts. (42) The requirement for Hollywood and the mass media to devote a vast amount of coverage to the “Holocaust”, Hitler and the “Nazis”, whilst having very little to say about Mao Zedong and Stalin, whom even Hoaxers concede killed more than Hitler. (43) Relentless whining and moaning about being hard done by, and extorting massive reparations, is inconsistent with the actions of people who have truly suffered great losses, yet is consistent with lying shysters who fabricated a hoax for political and business purposes. (44) ‘Confessions’ obtained by crushing testicles, breaking jaws, tearing out fingernails, beating with clubs and brass knuckles, etc., along with a desire to protect one’s family from reprisals. (45) The Jewish “German” communist Bruno Baum admitted to being one of the main fabricators of propaganda at the Auschwitz camp. He said, “It is no exaggeration when I say that the majority of all Auschwitz propaganda, which was spread at that time all over the world, was written by ourselves in the camp. […] We carried out this propaganda in [for] the world public until our very last day of presence in Auschwitz.” (46) Dr. Arno J. Mayer, a Jewish “historian”, tried to explain away the absence of evidence by stating, “Sources for the study of the gas chambers are at once rare and unreliable. Even though Hitler and the Nazis made no secret of their war on the Jews, the SS operatives dutifully eliminated all traces of their murderous activities and instruments. No written orders for gassing have turned up thus far. The SS not only destroyed most camp records, which were in any case incomplete, but also razed nearly all killing and crematory installations well before the arrival of Soviet troops. Likewise, care was taken to dispose of the bones and ashes of the victims.” (47) Simone Veil, a Jewish “French” politician who survived the Auschwitz “factory of death”, tried to explain away the absence of evidence by stating, “Yet everyone knows that the Nazis destroyed these gas chambers and systematically eradicated all the witnesses.” (48) There is a contradiction between systematically eradicating all the witnesses and releasing 20,000 inmates from Majdanek, who would be witnesses to the cruelty if it were a “death camp”. (49) Mainstream sources recognize that Simon Wiesenthal was a “liar and a fraud“, who lied about nearly everything in his life. He had numerous contradictory versions of his wartime exploits, which are so far fetched that they are virtually a benchmark test of gullibility. (50) A previous claim by Jews – in their Babylonian Talmud – that “four billion – or as some say, forty million” – Jews were exterminated by the Romans at Bethar, and there was so much blood, it was up to the horses’ nostrils, and it was enough to move stones the size of 40 se’ah (293 liters) and to flow into the sea for a distance of four miles. (51) Hitler’s true policy – of expelling the Jews from Germany – was entirely consistent with previous expulsions of Jews from more than 100 locations throughout history, when the host population threw out Jews after becoming aware of their subversive nature and their destructive effect on the host nation’s culture and civilization. There has never been any singling out of Jews for “extermination”, which is why their population remains around 15 million today. (52) Rabbi Stephen Wise’s statement of June 10, 1900, as reported in the Jewish-owned New York Times the next day, “There are 6,000,000 living, bleeding, suffering arguments in favor of Zionism“, at a Federation of American Zionists meeting at Cooper Union in Manhattan. (53) The ‘prediction’ by Joseph Seff, President of the Federation of Ukrainian Jews in America, as reported in The New York Times of September 8, 1919, of “This fact that the population of 6,000,000 souls in Ukrainia and in Poland have received notice through action and by word that they are going to be completely exterminated“. (54) The ‘prediction’ by Jews, as reported in The New York Times of July 20, 1921, that “Russia’s 6,000,000 Jews are facing extermination by massacre“. (55) Rabbi Wise’s claim, reported in The New York Times of April 18, 1938, that “millions of Jews are dying today“. (56) The allegation by “spokesmen” for Rabbi Wise’s World Jewish Congress, as reported in The New York Times of June 30, 1942, that Jews “were being shot by firing squads at the rate of 1,000 daily” and “1,000,000” had already been “slain by Nazis”. (57) Soviet Jewish communist Ilya Ehrenburg’s announcement in Soviet War News as early as December 22, 1944, months in advance of the war’s end, that the Germans had “annihilated six millioninnocent people”, together with claims prior to that by other Jews that “close to six million” Jews had been killed. (58) The failure of the “six million” headline claim to be revised accordingly in the 1990s when the alleged Auschwitz death toll was revised downwards from four million to between one million and one-and-a-half million. (59) The admission by honest Jews such as Gerard Menuhin (son of violinist Yehudi), Paul Eisen, Roger Dommergue, David Cole and Joseph G. Burg that the Holocaust tale is false. (60) The requirement to prop up the official narrative by blowing up and killing François Duprat and crippling his wife, kicking in Prof. Robert Faurisson’s face, attempting to murder Ernst Zundel by burning down his house and sending a pipe bomb in the post, threatening and beating up David Cole and other revisionists, ordering the blocking of certain websites in Hungary, making criticism of the “Holocaust” narrative an imprisonable offense in most European countries and even detaining and extraditing Germans from Canada and the US for criticising the fable, sentencing an 87-year-old grandmother to jail several times for saying she did not believe Auschwitz was a “death camp”, and even jailing defense lawyers for defending their revisionist clients too well. Truth needs no laws to protect it. Now let’s examine some of the evidence in more detail. Read the rest here. Posted by SoldierofYah at 5:52 AM 1 comment: Labels: General Overview http://exposing-the-holocaust-hoax-archive.blogspot.com

takeourworldback.com/sixty-reasons.html

________________________________

Part I of “Debunking the Holocaust” is here.

________________________________

Poisoned cabbage experiments on disabled children in North Korean labor camps?

____________________________

Syrian refugee: “Raped with a rat”

______________________________

Kuwaiti baby incubator hoax

______________________________

Paul Berg’s argument examined

______________________________

Germar Rudolf’s argument examined

______________________________

Is the Holocaust a religion?

______________________________

Is revisionism heresy? Are revisionists heretics?

_______________________________________________

Persecution of Holocaust heretics: modern-day witch hunts

_____________________________________________

The Holocaust: Modern-day hysteria

______________________

How did the Holocaust story spread? Folie-a-deux madness examined

Claims that North Korea experiments on political prisoners and the disabled

Video is full of copy and paste

North Koreans were the victims in live human experimentation – twice

Unit 731

American use of anthrax in the Korean War

Ryongyong Disaster in North Korea

Germans were accused of human experimentation too

Ryongyong Disaster in North Korea